Re: SPARC Ada compilation hangs

2007-10-19 Thread Eric Botcazou
> I would appreciate it is one of the SPARC/Solaris > users would see if they can duplicate this. I cannot duplicate on SPARC/Solaris, but my tree is not pristine. This is for a --disable--bootstrap compiler built at -O0 -g. -- Eric Botcazou

Re: SPARC Ada compilation hangs

2007-10-19 Thread Joel Sherrill
Eric Botcazou wrote: I would appreciate it is one of the SPARC/Solaris users would see if they can duplicate this. I cannot duplicate on SPARC/Solaris, but my tree is not pristine. This is for a --disable--bootstrap compiler built at -O0 -g. The two files in question do compile at -O0

Re: df_insn_refs_record's handling of global_regs[]

2007-10-19 Thread H.J. Lu
On Fri, Oct 19, 2007 at 05:42:58PM -0700, Seongbae Park (박성배, 朴成培) wrote: > On 10/19/07, David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > From: "Seongbae Park (박성배, 朴成培)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 17:25:14 -0700 > > > > > If you're not in a hurry, can you wait > > > till I run the r

Re: df_insn_refs_record's handling of global_regs[]

2007-10-19 Thread David Miller
From: "Seongbae Park (박성배, 朴成培)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 22:56:49 -0700 > Did you replace the DF_REF_REG_USE with DEF ? > If so, that's not correct. We need to add DEF as well as USE: ... > Then, we'll need to change the df_invalidated_by_call loop > not to add global_regs[] a

Re: df_insn_refs_record's handling of global_regs[]

2007-10-19 Thread David Miller
From: "Seongbae Park (박성배, 朴成培)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 17:25:14 -0700 > If you're not in a hurry, can you wait > till I run the regtest against 4.2 on x86-64 ? > I've already discussed the patch with Kenny > and we agreed that this is the right approach, > but I'd like to see

Re: df_insn_refs_record's handling of global_regs[]

2007-10-19 Thread Seongbae Park (박성배, 朴成培)
On 10/19/07, David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From: "Seongbae Park (박성배, 朴成培)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 17:25:14 -0700 > > > If you're not in a hurry, can you wait > > till I run the regtest against 4.2 on x86-64 ? > > I've already discussed the patch with Kenny > > and

Re: df_insn_refs_record's handling of global_regs[]

2007-10-19 Thread Seongbae Park (박성배, 朴成培)
On 10/19/07, David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From: "Seongbae Park (박성배, 朴成培)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 22:56:49 -0700 > > > Did you replace the DF_REF_REG_USE with DEF ? > > If so, that's not correct. We need to add DEF as well as USE: > ... > > Then, we'll need to c

gcc-4.3-20071019 is now available

2007-10-19 Thread gccadmin
Snapshot gcc-4.3-20071019 is now available on ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.3-20071019/ and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details. This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.3 SVN branch with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk

Removal of pre-ISO C++ items from include/backwards

2007-10-19 Thread Richard Guenther
2007-10-18 Benjamin Kosnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Removal of pre-ISO C++ items from include/backwards. * include/Makefile.am (backward_headers): Remove all but strstream, backward_warning.h. * include/Makefile.in: Regenerate. * include/backward/new.h: Remov

SPARC Ada compilation hangs

2007-10-19 Thread Joel Sherrill
Hi, When compiling GNAT/RTEMS to SPARC on the SVN trunk, the compilation of g-catiio.adb and g-spipat.adb hang when using -O2. I kill the compilation and do them by hand with -O0 and the build continues. I would appreciate it is one of the SPARC/Solaris users would see if they can duplicate thi

Ada standard elaboration order

2007-10-19 Thread Christophe Meudec
Just an old newbie question. when I look at the elaboration order generated by gnatbind for the standard libraries I get the following: ... system.soft_links (spec) system.soft_links (body) ... ada.exceptions (body) ... but the body of soft_links contains Ada.Exceptions.Save_Occ

Re: SPARC Ada compilation hangs

2007-10-19 Thread Eric Botcazou
> The two files in question do compile at -O0 so you wouldn't > trip it. You misunderstood, only the compiler is built at -O0 -g, the runtime is built normally at -O2 -g. -- Eric Botcazou

Re: Ada standard elaboration order

2007-10-19 Thread Florian Weimer
* Christophe Meudec: > So how can the body of system.soft_links be elaborated prior to the > body of ada.exceptions since it is dependent on it? The standard library is not subject to the elaboration rules of the language. It's not written in standard Ada, either.