On 10/19/07, David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From: "Seongbae Park (박성배, 朴成培)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 17:25:14 -0700 > > > If you're not in a hurry, can you wait > > till I run the regtest against 4.2 on x86-64 ? > > I've already discussed the patch with Kenny > > and we agreed that this is the right approach, > > but I'd like to see the clean regtest on x86 for both 4.2 and 4.3 > > before I approve. > > Thanks, > > I am in no rush, please let me know if you want some help > tracking down the failure you are seeing. > > Since you say it is a libgomp failure... I wonder if some of > the atomic primitives need some side effect markings which > are missing and thus exposed by not clobbering global regs > at call sites any more.
It looks like it's just a flaky test - it randomly fails on my test machine with or without the patch (for interested, it's omp_parse3.f90 with -O0). I haven't started 4.2 testing yet - I'll let you know when I get that done. -- #pragma ident "Seongbae Park, compiler, http://seongbae.blogspot.com";
