Re: c++0x concepts in gcc call

2008-02-03 Thread Gerald Pfeifer
On Tue, 29 Jan 2008, Doug Gregor wrote: > Okay, done. Thanks! I added the minor patch below on top. Gerald Index: svn.html === RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/svn.html,v retrieving revision 1.75 diff -u -3 -p -r1.75 svn.html ---

Re: c++0x concepts in gcc call

2008-01-29 Thread Doug Gregor
On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 5:38 PM, Gerald Pfeifer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, 27 Jan 2008, Doug Gregor wrote: > > I was planning to kill the cxx0x-branch outright, because it has > > nothing that isn't available on mainline (except a not-nearly-complete > > delegating constructors impleme

Re: c++0x concepts in gcc call

2008-01-28 Thread Gerald Pfeifer
On Sun, 27 Jan 2008, Doug Gregor wrote: > I was planning to kill the cxx0x-branch outright, because it has > nothing that isn't available on mainline (except a not-nearly-complete > delegating constructors implementation), and will not be used. If this > would be better handled by moving the entry

Re: c++0x concepts in gcc call

2008-01-27 Thread Doug Gregor
On Jan 27, 2008 8:23 PM, Gerald Pfeifer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, 25 Jan 2008, Doug Gregor wrote: > > Organization: > > - We'll start a fresh branch in the FSF repository dedicated to concepts > >(it's branches/cxx0x-concepts-branch). Initially, Doug and Jason > >will be maintai

Re: c++0x concepts in gcc call

2008-01-27 Thread Gerald Pfeifer
On Fri, 25 Jan 2008, Doug Gregor wrote: > Organization: > - We'll start a fresh branch in the FSF repository dedicated to concepts >(it's branches/cxx0x-concepts-branch). Initially, Doug and Jason >will be maintainers of this branch Thanks for documenting this in svn.html! Just one quip:

Re: c++0x concepts in gcc call

2008-01-25 Thread Doug Gregor
On Jan 21, 2008 8:08 PM, Benjamin Kosnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jason Merrill, Doug Gregor, and I invite all interested GCC hackers to > discuss implementation of the compiler and library parts of the > C++0x concepts proposals. This is to be a brainstorming session, where > we discuss the be

Re: c++0x concepts in gcc call

2008-01-22 Thread Benjamin Kosnik
> Is there a chance of any sort of streaming audio broadcast instead of > having to dial in? Not for this call, sorry. -benjamin

Re: c++0x concepts in gcc call

2008-01-22 Thread David Fang
Will you allow people to call in as an observer, and not a participater? You beat me to the post! I'm primarily interested in listening in, or reading a transcript at the very least. Yes, as long as we have enough lines for full participants. Please note that I'll summarize this call in em

Re: c++0x concepts in gcc call

2008-01-22 Thread Benjamin Kosnik
> Will you allow people to call in as an observer, and not a > participater? Yes, as long as we have enough lines for full participants. Please note that I'll summarize this call in email afterward, so that mechanism will also be available to lurkers. -benjamin

Re: c++0x concepts in gcc call

2008-01-22 Thread NightStrike
On 1/21/08, Benjamin Kosnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello all! > > Jason Merrill, Doug Gregor, and I invite all interested GCC hackers to > discuss implementation of the compiler and library parts of the > C++0x concepts proposals. This is to be a brainstorming session, where > we discuss th

c++0x concepts in gcc call

2008-01-21 Thread Benjamin Kosnik
Hello all! Jason Merrill, Doug Gregor, and I invite all interested GCC hackers to discuss implementation of the compiler and library parts of the C++0x concepts proposals. This is to be a brainstorming session, where we discuss the best way to complete the work, what can be taken from existing br