On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 5:38 PM, Gerald Pfeifer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 27 Jan 2008, Doug Gregor wrote:
> > I was planning to kill the cxx0x-branch outright, because it has
> > nothing that isn't available on mainline (except a not-nearly-complete
> > delegating constructors implementation), and will not be used. If this
> > would be better handled by moving the entry to "Inactive Development
> > Branches", I'll certainly do that.
>
> Yes, for historical reasons it would be nice to have that branch
> documented there, with a note that/when it was merged into mainline
> as for some of the other examples there.
Okay, done.
> Gerald
>
> PS: Nice patch of yours that fixes seven PRs at once. :-)
Now it's nine PRs :)
- Doug
Index: svn.html
N===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/svn.html,v
retrieving revision 1.73
diff -u -r1.73 svn.html
--- svn.html 28 Jan 2008 15:19:04 -0000 1.73
+++ svn.html 29 Jan 2008 17:37:47 -0000
@@ -779,7 +779,12 @@
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</a>>
</dd>
-
+ <dt>cxx0x-branch</dt>
+ <dd>This branch was for developed of C++0x features, and all
+ features developed on this branch have been merged to
+ mainline. Future C++0x features will be developed against mainline
+ or, in the case of concepts, on
+ the <a href="projects/cxx0x.html#concepts">cxx0x-concepts-branch</a>.</dd>
</dl>
</body>
