On Sat, 6 Jan 2007, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We currently do not have an active maintainer for the i386 port. The
> only listed maintainer for the port is rth, and he hasn't been around
> to approve patches in a while. This situation is a bit strange for
> a port that IMHO is one of the
On Sat, Jan 06, 2007 at 04:42:27PM +0100, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We currently do not have an active maintainer for the i386 port. The
> only listed maintainer for the port is rth, and he hasn't been around
> to approve patches in a while. This situation is a bit strange for
> a port t
Hi,
We currently do not have an active maintainer for the i386 port. The
only listed maintainer for the port is rth, and he hasn't been around
to approve patches in a while. This situation is a bit strange for
a port that IMHO is one of the most important ports GCC has...
In the mean time, pat
