On Sat, Jan 06, 2007 at 04:42:27PM +0100, Steven Bosscher wrote: > Hi, > > We currently do not have an active maintainer for the i386 port. The > only listed maintainer for the port is rth, and he hasn't been around > to approve patches in a while. This situation is a bit strange for > a port that IMHO is one of the most important ports GCC has... > > In the mean time, patches don't get approved (see e.g. [1]), or they > get approved by middle-end maintainers who, strictly speaking, should > not be approving backend patches, as I understand it. > > So, can the SC please appoint a new/extra i386 port maintainer? >
I think it is overdue. H.J.
