Daniel Berlin wrote:
On Mon, 2005-05-23 at 12:26 -0700, Mark Mitchell wrote:
Daniel Berlin wrote:
While moving FIELD_DECL to it's own substruct, the following questions
have come up. I figured one of you might know:
1. Do we need DECL_ASSEMBLER_NAME on FIELD_DECL? I can't think of a
place
On Mon, 2005-05-23 at 12:26 -0700, Mark Mitchell wrote:
> Daniel Berlin wrote:
> > While moving FIELD_DECL to it's own substruct, the following questions
> > have come up. I figured one of you might know:
> >
> > 1. Do we need DECL_ASSEMBLER_NAME on FIELD_DECL? I can't think of a
> > place where
Daniel Berlin wrote:
While moving FIELD_DECL to it's own substruct, the following questions
have come up. I figured one of you might know:
1. Do we need DECL_ASSEMBLER_NAME on FIELD_DECL? I can't think of a
place where we would actually try to *output* a FIELD_DECL directly, but
maybe i've mis
On Sat, 2005-05-21 at 21:32 -0700, Zack Weinberg wrote:
> Daniel Berlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I've actually discovered that we set the assembler name on a field that
> > is the vtable, but never actually use it again, at least for DWARF2 and
> > STABS (it's set to a constant called VFI
Daniel Berlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I've actually discovered that we set the assembler name on a field that
> is the vtable, but never actually use it again, at least for DWARF2 and
> STABS (it's set to a constant called VFIELD_NAME).
> I grepped .s file from all of libjava and the stl tes
On Sun, 2005-05-22 at 03:13 +0200, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
> Daniel Berlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | On Sun, 2005-05-22 at 02:14 +0200, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
> | > Daniel Berlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> | >
> | > | While moving FIELD_DECL to it's own substruct, the following questi
Daniel Berlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Sun, 2005-05-22 at 02:14 +0200, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
| > Daniel Berlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| >
| > | While moving FIELD_DECL to it's own substruct, the following questions
| > | have come up. I figured one of you might know:
| > |
| > |
On Sun, 2005-05-22 at 02:14 +0200, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
> Daniel Berlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | While moving FIELD_DECL to it's own substruct, the following questions
> | have come up. I figured one of you might know:
> |
> | 1. Do we need DECL_ASSEMBLER_NAME on FIELD_DECL? I can't
Daniel Berlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| While moving FIELD_DECL to it's own substruct, the following questions
| have come up. I figured one of you might know:
|
| 1. Do we need DECL_ASSEMBLER_NAME on FIELD_DECL? I can't think of a
| place where we would actually try to *output* a FIELD_DEC
While moving FIELD_DECL to it's own substruct, the following questions
have come up. I figured one of you might know:
1. Do we need DECL_ASSEMBLER_NAME on FIELD_DECL? I can't think of a
place where we would actually try to *output* a FIELD_DECL directly, but
maybe i've missed something. I ask b
10 matches
Mail list logo
