On Sun, 2005-05-22 at 02:14 +0200, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote: > Daniel Berlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | While moving FIELD_DECL to it's own substruct, the following questions > | have come up. I figured one of you might know: > | > | 1. Do we need DECL_ASSEMBLER_NAME on FIELD_DECL? I can't think of a > | place where we would actually try to *output* a FIELD_DECL directly, but > | maybe i've missed something. I ask because the C frontend tests > | decl_assembler_name on field decl, but never sets it on them. > > > What happens when you have this (in C++) > > namespace foo { > union { > int baz; > double foobar; > } bar; > }; >
I tried this, and it still doesn't access DECL_ASSEMBLER_NAME of FIELD_DECL. > ? > > -- Gaby