On Fri, Jul 01, 2005 at 09:27:48PM -0400, DJ Delorie wrote:
> Note that my complaint about the lack of endian support in that code
> still stands ;-)
I seem to recall running into this before. It's not a lack of
endian support, it's one piece lying to another about the size
of the object. Which
> Trying to fake two kinds of pointers when we only have one doesn't seem
> wise to me.
>
> A possible solution is to use function descriptors.
Both m32c (my local copy at least) and xstormy use 16 bit thunks to
reference the address of a function outside the first 64k of address
space.
In thi
DJ Delorie wrote:
For some chips, like xstormy16 and m16c, function pointers are wider
than other pointers.
Trying to fake two kinds of pointers when we only have one doesn't seem
wise to me.
A possible solution is to use function descriptors. See FDESC_EXPR and
ASM_OUTPUT_FDESC. So now w
