On Fri, Jul 01, 2005 at 09:27:48PM -0400, DJ Delorie wrote: > Note that my complaint about the lack of endian support in that code > still stands ;-)
I seem to recall running into this before. It's not a lack of endian support, it's one piece lying to another about the size of the object. Which results in too few bytes being emitted, and later generic bits adding padding. Or something like that. r~
