Re: http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-3.4/changes.html

2005-04-25 Thread Giovanni Bajo
Gerald Pfeifer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Here is a unified diff for the proposed change (I think). > > Johan, Giovanni, I just noticed that this one apparently feel trough > the cracks? > > I had assumed that Giovanni would just go ahead an apply it since he's > an expert in that area and the

RE: http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-3.4/changes.html

2005-04-24 Thread Gerald Pfeifer
On Tue, 1 Mar 2005, Johan Bergman (KI/EAB) wrote: > Here is a unified diff for the proposed change (I think). Johan, Giovanni, I just noticed that this one apparently feel trough the cracks? I had assumed that Giovanni would just go ahead an apply it since he's an expert in that area and the patc

RE: http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-3.4/changes.html

2005-02-28 Thread Johan Bergman \(KI/EAB\)
Hi, Here is a unified diff for the proposed change (I think). BR, Johan -Original Message- From: Giovanni Bajo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: den 1 mars 2005 02:03 To: Johan Bergman (KI/EAB) Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-3.4/changes.html Johan Bergman (KI

Re: http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-3.4/changes.html

2005-02-28 Thread Giovanni Bajo
Johan Bergman (KI/EAB) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I propose the following change to > http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-3.4/changes.html. (The "alternative solution" > was proposed by myself a while ago, > but now I have realized that it is not backwards compatible.) Please post the patch as an unified di