RE: http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-3.4/changes.html

[Gerald Pfeifer]

On Tue, 1 Mar 2005, Johan Bergman (KI/EAB) wrote:
> Here is a unified diff for the proposed change (I think).

Johan, Giovanni, I just noticed that this one apparently feel trough
the cracks?

I had assumed that Giovanni would just go ahead an apply it since he's
an expert in that area and the patch even was rather short, but I do not
see it in CVS, so I just committed it.

Gerald

Tweak description of alternative solution for name lookup problem.
By Johan Bergman (KI/EAB) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 

--- changes.htm%        2005-02-28 21:46:56.000000000 +0100
+++ changes.htm 2005-02-28 21:46:56.000000000 +0100
@@ -429,10 +429,10 @@
        template &lt;typename T&gt; struct C : B&lt;T&gt; {
          void h ()
          {
-               m = 0; // error
-               f ();  // error
-               n = 0; // ::n is modified
-               g ();  // ::g is called
+           m = 0; // error
+           f ();  // error
+           n = 0; // ::n is modified
+           g ();  // ::g is called
          }
        };</pre>
        <p>You must make the names dependent, e.g. by prefixing them
@@ -446,7 +446,8 @@
          this-&gt;n = 0
          this-&gt;g ();
        }</pre>
-       <p>As an alternative solution, you may use <code>using</code>
+       <p>As an alternative solution (unfortunately not backwards
+       compatible with GCC 3.3), you may use <code>using</code>
        declarations instead of <code>this-&gt;</code>:</p>
        <pre>
        template &lt;typename T&gt; struct C : B&lt;T&gt; {
@@ -456,10 +457,10 @@
          using B&lt;T&gt;::g;
          void h ()
          {
-               m = 0;
-               f ();
-               n = 0;
-               g ();
+           m = 0;
+           f ();
+           n = 0;
+           g ();
          }
        };</pre></li>