On Thu, 2006-08-31 at 17:52 -0400, Miguel Angel Champin Catalan wrote:
> We are students of computer sciences in the Santa Maria University,
> Chile. We just want to know if the function "gets" it's too dangerous
> for a warning. The fact is that our teacher's assistant give us a
> homework, an
Michael Eager wrote:
Miguel Angel Champin Catalan wrote:
Hello:
We are students of computer sciences in the Santa Maria University,
Chile. We just want to know if the function "gets" it's too dangerous
for a warning. The fact is that our teacher's assistant give us a
homework, and one restri
Miguel Angel Champin Catalan wrote:
Hello:
We are students of computer sciences in the Santa Maria University,
Chile. We just want to know if the function "gets" it's too dangerous
for a warning. The fact is that our teacher's assistant give us a
homework, and one restriction was to use gcc t
On Thu, Aug 31, 2006 at 05:52:16PM -0400, Miguel Angel Champin Catalan wrote:
> We ask you for a simple explanation (if it's possible) about our
> warning, telling that "gets" is not too dangerous, because in our case,
> works perfectly, under some restrictions obviously.
Really a gcc-help topic
>
> Hello:
>
> We are students of computer sciences in the Santa Maria University,
> Chile. We just want to know if the function "gets" it's too dangerous
> for a warning. The fact is that our teacher's assistant give us a
> homework, and one restriction was to use gcc to compile our code,
>
