On Thu, Aug 31, 2006 at 05:52:16PM -0400, Miguel Angel Champin Catalan wrote:
> We ask you for a simple explanation (if it's possible) about our 
> warning, telling that "gets" is not too dangerous, because in our case, 
> works perfectly, under some restrictions obviously.

Really a gcc-help topic but ...

Google for "never use gets".  It most emphatically is too dangerous.



Reply via email to