On Thu, Aug 31, 2006 at 05:52:16PM -0400, Miguel Angel Champin Catalan wrote: > We ask you for a simple explanation (if it's possible) about our > warning, telling that "gets" is not too dangerous, because in our case, > works perfectly, under some restrictions obviously.
Really a gcc-help topic but ... Google for "never use gets". It most emphatically is too dangerous.