Re: libstdc++ required binutils version [was: Re: gcc 4.0.1 testsuite failures on sparc64-linux: 59 unexpected gcc failures]

2005-07-12 Thread Dan Kegel
Jonathan Wakely wrote: The minimum binutils for libstdc++ is now 2.15.90.0.1.1, I don't know about the rest of GCC. ... and IMHO testresults look quite good except abi_check, don't they? i.e. do you mean updating binutils will resolve abi_check issue in libstdc++ testsuite? I'd assume yes, b

Re: libstdc++ required binutils version [was: Re: gcc 4.0.1 testsuite failures on sparc64-linux: 59 unexpected gcc failures]

2005-07-12 Thread Jonathan Wakely
On Tue, Jul 12, 2005 at 01:55:11PM +0200, Karel Gardas wrote: > On Tue, 12 Jul 2005, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > >>On Tue, 12 Jul 2005, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > >> > >>>The minimum binutils for libstdc++ is now 2.15.90.0.1.1, I don't know > >>>about the rest of GCC. > >> > >>does this also apply t

libstdc++ required binutils version [was: Re: gcc 4.0.1 testsuite failures on sparc64-linux: 59 unexpected gcc failures]

2005-07-12 Thread Karel Gardas
On Tue, 12 Jul 2005, Jonathan Wakely wrote: On Tue, 12 Jul 2005, Jonathan Wakely wrote: On Tue, Jul 12, 2005 at 12:20:16PM +0200, Christian Joensson wrote: On 7/12/05, Christian Joensson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 7/12/05, Eric Botcazou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Joe Buck reports the

Re: gcc 4.0.1 testsuite failures on sparc64-linux: 59 unexpected gcc failures

2005-07-12 Thread Jonathan Wakely
On Tue, Jul 12, 2005 at 01:23:23PM +0200, Karel Gardas wrote: > > Hello, > > On Tue, 12 Jul 2005, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > >On Tue, Jul 12, 2005 at 12:20:16PM +0200, Christian Joensson wrote: > > > >>On 7/12/05, Christian Joensson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>>On 7/12/05, Eric Botcazou <[EM

Re: gcc 4.0.1 testsuite failures on sparc64-linux: 59 unexpected gcc failures

2005-07-12 Thread Karel Gardas
Hello, On Tue, 12 Jul 2005, Jonathan Wakely wrote: On Tue, Jul 12, 2005 at 12:20:16PM +0200, Christian Joensson wrote: On 7/12/05, Christian Joensson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 7/12/05, Eric Botcazou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Joe Buck reports the same problems on SPARC/Solaris: http:

Re: gcc 4.0.1 testsuite failures on sparc64-linux: 59 unexpected gcc failures

2005-07-12 Thread Jonathan Wakely
On Tue, Jul 12, 2005 at 12:20:16PM +0200, Christian Joensson wrote: > On 7/12/05, Christian Joensson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 7/12/05, Eric Botcazou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Joe Buck reports the same problems on SPARC/Solaris: > > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-07

Re: gcc 4.0.1 testsuite failures on sparc64-linux: 59 unexpected gcc failures

2005-07-12 Thread Christian Joensson
On 7/12/05, Christian Joensson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 7/12/05, Eric Botcazou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Joe Buck reports the same problems on SPARC/Solaris: > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-07/msg00633.html > > > > According to my testing, the fix is to upgrade to GNU Bi

Re: gcc 4.0.1 testsuite failures on sparc64-linux: 59 unexpected gcc failures

2005-07-12 Thread Christian Joensson
On 7/12/05, Eric Botcazou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > FAIL: gcc.misc-tests/bprob-1.c execution,-g -fprofile-arcs > > UNRESOLVED: gcc.misc-tests/bprob-1.c compilation, -g > > -fbranch-probabilities UNRESOLVED: gcc.misc-tests/bprob-1.c execution, > > -g -fbranch-probabilities FAIL: gcc.misc

Re: gcc 4.0.1 testsuite failures on sparc64-linux: 59 unexpected gcc failures

2005-07-12 Thread Eric Botcazou
> FAIL: gcc.misc-tests/bprob-1.c execution,-g -fprofile-arcs > UNRESOLVED: gcc.misc-tests/bprob-1.c compilation, -g > -fbranch-probabilities UNRESOLVED: gcc.misc-tests/bprob-1.c execution, > -g -fbranch-probabilities FAIL: gcc.misc-tests/bprob-1.c execution,-O0 > -fprofile-arcs > UN