On Tue, Jul 12, 2005 at 01:23:23PM +0200, Karel Gardas wrote: > > Hello, > > On Tue, 12 Jul 2005, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > >On Tue, Jul 12, 2005 at 12:20:16PM +0200, Christian Joensson wrote: > > > >>On 7/12/05, Christian Joensson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>>On 7/12/05, Eric Botcazou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >>>>Joe Buck reports the same problems on SPARC/Solaris: > >>>>http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-07/msg00633.html > >>>> > >>>>According to my testing, the fix is to upgrade to GNU Binutils 2.16 or > >>>>2.16.1. > >>> > >>>you wouldn't happen to know if binutils-2.15.94.0.2.2-2.1 (from fedora > >>>core development) would suffice? or anyone else?? > >> > >>or even binutils-2.15.92.0.2-5.1 from fedora core 3 updates? > > > >That version works for me on x86_64. > > > >The minimum binutils for libstdc++ is now 2.15.90.0.1.1, I don't know > >about the rest of GCC. > > does this also apply to other than sparc platforms? I'm cunfused by your
I believe that version applies to x86 linux and x86-64 linux. I don't know about Sparc linux. The only hard fact I can confirm first-hand is that the latest binutils from FC3 updates works for me on x86_64. > note about x86_64, since I'm not able to find any notes about minimal > binutils 2.15.90.0.1.1 version required for libstdc++ build on AMD64 > linux. Especially: > > http://gcc.gnu.org/install/specific.html > > notes more recent binutils version than 2.15 release only in case of > *-*-solaris2* configuration. Yes, I know. I'm in the process of updating the libstdc++ docs here, which are very out of date: http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libstdc++/install.html#prereqs I will also have to add something to the main config docs to say that libstdc++ (and other runtime libs) may have more specific requirements, so check the relevant docs. jon
