* Joe Buck:
> Well, maybe. But what about a revision that modifies code and that
> also modifies the WWW to describe the code modification? If everything
> were in the same subversion repository, it could be one change.
Only if you check out a common parent directory, which is probably not
a co
On Mon, Oct 31, 2005 at 05:31:51PM +0100, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> Per se there doesn't seem to be as much of an advantage for wwwdocs
> as we had for gcc (no branches, most changes only to one or two files,
> no need for binary regression search, no tagging,...) so it's not
> urgent.
Well, maybe.
On Mon, 31 Oct 2005, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> On Sun, 16 Oct 2005, Daniel Berlin wrote:
> > I should probably note again that i don't plan to convert wwwdocs to svn
> > right now, because the checkout scripts are a bit hard to follow, etc.
>
> Per se there doesn't seem to be as much of an advant
On Sun, 16 Oct 2005, Daniel Berlin wrote:
> I should probably note again that i don't plan to convert wwwdocs to svn
> right now, because the checkout scripts are a bit hard to follow, etc.
Per se there doesn't seem to be as much of an advantage for wwwdocs
as we had for gcc (no branches, most c
On Fri, 2005-10-14 at 11:40 +, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Oct 2005, Kaveh R. Ghazi wrote:
>
> > their corresponding svn commands posted on the website? Hmm, I guess
> > we would need to update these pages to the svn equivalents which would
> > pretty much cover the basics of a how-to
(Sorry for the C-n-P, my regular email is down till sunday afternoon.
Hopefully notes won't screw this email up too badly)
>Has any thought been put into helping the 200+ people with write
>access migrate?
Of course
There is a basic how to guide for CVS users on the wiki, at
http://gcc.gnu.or
On Fri, 14 Oct 2005, Kaveh R. Ghazi wrote:
> their corresponding svn commands posted on the website? Hmm, I guess
> we would need to update these pages to the svn equivalents which would
> pretty much cover the basics of a how-to guide:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/cvs.html
> http://gcc.gnu.org/cvswri
> I'm actually in the middle of building a fully merged + converted repo
> (IE exactyl what the final repo will look like, including the merge
> from old-gcc).
>
> It should be done in another 10 hours or less.
>
> I was planning to announce it and update the wiki's page so that those
> w
On Thu, 2005-10-13 at 15:54 -0700, Mike Stump wrote:
> On Oct 8, 2005, at 5:47 PM, Daniel Berlin wrote:
> > Thus, i'm going to put an updated repo on gcc.gnu.org on Monday (i was
> > converting it
>
> Could I request that:
>
> svn ls svn+ssh://gcc.gnu.org/export/u0/gccsvn/gccrepo/branches | grep
On Oct 8, 2005, at 5:47 PM, Daniel Berlin wrote:
Thus, i'm going to put an updated repo on gcc.gnu.org on Monday (i was
converting it
Could I request that:
svn ls svn+ssh://gcc.gnu.org/export/u0/gccsvn/gccrepo/branches | grep
-i apple
output a line or two (or five) before in a test repo be
On Tue, 2005-10-11 at 02:02 +0200, Giovanni Bajo wrote:
> Daniel Berlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Thus, i'm going to put an updated repo on gcc.gnu.org on Monday (i was
> > converting it, but it looks like they shutdown the machines at watson)
> > and do a few test branch merges to make sur
Daniel Berlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thus, i'm going to put an updated repo on gcc.gnu.org on Monday (i was
> converting it, but it looks like they shutdown the machines at watson)
> and do a few test branch merges to make sur eall the commit mails come
> out okay for very large cases.
Will
On Sat, Oct 08, 2005 at 08:47:19PM -0400, Daniel Berlin wrote:
>Angela, you said you had a good solution to the restricted shell problem
>(IE the need to allow both cvs server and svnserve to run).
? I wrote a script which seems to work for providing a restricted shell.
Does Angela have something
13 matches
Mail list logo
