On Mon, Oct 31, 2005 at 05:31:51PM +0100, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > Per se there doesn't seem to be as much of an advantage for wwwdocs > as we had for gcc (no branches, most changes only to one or two files, > no need for binary regression search, no tagging,...) so it's not > urgent.
Well, maybe. But what about a revision that modifies code and that also modifies the WWW to describe the code modification? If everything were in the same subversion repository, it could be one change. Of course, much of the website is generated from .texi documents, and those would be under subversion. But not everything.
