Jack Howarth wrote:
Do we have any other targets that link gcc (and xgcc)
with the shared libgcc? I see that i386 and x86_64 linux
creates a gcc (and xgcc) linked to the static libgcc.
If any other targets use a shared libgcc for gcc (and xgcc)
they may be broken as well.
That's a good hint
Mark,
While I don't see any particular differences in how
gcc 4.3 branch links its shared libraries with or without
r131198 applied, I do notice that it causes the xgcc created
to be linked against the system libgcc. Without r131198,
only the xgcc in stage1-gcc is linked to the system libgcc.
Wi
Jack Howarth wrote:
Mark,
One other question. Does the bug fixed by the offending patch...
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-12/msg01010.html
...merit breaking even a secondary target? Wouldn't it be better
to regress that patch out for gcc 4.3.0 (to be reintroduced in
gcc 4.3.1 when th
Mark,
One other question. Does the bug fixed by the offending patch...
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-12/msg01010.html
...merit breaking even a secondary target? Wouldn't it be better
to regress that patch out for gcc 4.3.0 (to be reintroduced in
gcc 4.3.1 when the problems that it cau
Jack Howarth wrote:
Mark,
I can understand the FSF gcc developers' frustration at
the lack of participation by the darwin developers. However
I still think it merits at least understanding why r131198
is breaking the linkage on darwin. It may well be that darwin
to exposing a latent bug in the
Mark,
I can understand the FSF gcc developers' frustration at
the lack of participation by the darwin developers. However
I still think it merits at least understanding why r131198
is breaking the linkage on darwin. It may well be that darwin
to exposing a latent bug in the use of install-leaf.
Jack Howarth wrote:
Richard,
This problem appears to be caused by...
Author: rsandifo
Date: Thu Dec 27 11:26:06 2007
New Revision: 131198
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=131198
Log:
libgcc/
* Makefile.in (all): Use install-leaf rather than install.
(ins
Richard,
This problem appears to be caused by...
Author: rsandifo
Date: Thu Dec 27 11:26:06 2007
New Revision: 131198
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=131198
Log:
libgcc/
* Makefile.in (all): Use install-leaf rather than install.
(install): Split most of t
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 3:14 PM, Jack Howarth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Current gcc 4.3 branch incorrectly links all of its
> shared libraries against the system libgcc instead of
> the copy it builds and installs (PR35401). It appears
> that the fix applied for PR30572 may have been
> di
