Jack Howarth wrote:
Mark,
One other question. Does the bug fixed by the offending patch...
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-12/msg01010.html
...merit breaking even a secondary target? Wouldn't it be better
to regress that patch out for gcc 4.3.0 (to be reintroduced in
gcc 4.3.1 when the problems that it causes for darwin are solved)?
I think it's important, since, IIUC, it improves our ability to test on
all platforms. But, I certainly encourage you to figure out why it
breaks Darwin and work out how to fix it!
--
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(650) 331-3385 x713
