Re: Getting the ARC port reviewed and accepted

2013-10-03 Thread Richard Earnshaw
On 02/10/13 14:59, Richard Biener wrote: > The main reason for technical review of a port is to avoid that it uses > deprecated mechanisms and thus blocks removal of them. Like > accepting a port that uses target macros when a corresponding > target hook exists, or accepting a port that uses reloa

Re: Getting the ARC port reviewed and accepted

2013-10-03 Thread Jeremy Bennett
On 30/09/13 17:09, Jeremy Bennett wrote: Hi all, You've probably seen that Joern Rennecke (amylaar) has been pinging repeatedly for help reviewing the ARC port: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-09/msg02072.html Joern is approved as a maintainer, and the tests have been reviewed and ap

Re: Getting the ARC port reviewed and accepted

2013-10-02 Thread David Malcolm
On Wed, 2013-10-02 at 15:59 +0200, Richard Biener wrote: > On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 3:49 PM, Andrew Haley wrote: > > On 10/02/2013 01:46 PM, David Edelsohn wrote: > >> > >> On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 4:31 AM, Andrew Haley wrote: > >>> > >>> On 10/02/2013 12:47 AM, David Edelsohn wrote: > > It

Re: Getting the ARC port reviewed and accepted

2013-10-02 Thread Richard Biener
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 3:49 PM, Andrew Haley wrote: > On 10/02/2013 01:46 PM, David Edelsohn wrote: >> >> On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 4:31 AM, Andrew Haley wrote: >>> >>> On 10/02/2013 12:47 AM, David Edelsohn wrote: It is unfortunate that global reviewers are so busy that they cannot r

Re: Getting the ARC port reviewed and accepted

2013-10-02 Thread Andrew Haley
On 10/02/2013 01:46 PM, David Edelsohn wrote: On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 4:31 AM, Andrew Haley wrote: On 10/02/2013 12:47 AM, David Edelsohn wrote: It is unfortunate that global reviewers are so busy that they cannot review the few, infrequent new port submissions. But I find it very distasteful f

Re: Getting the ARC port reviewed and accepted

2013-10-02 Thread David Edelsohn
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 4:31 AM, Andrew Haley wrote: > On 10/02/2013 12:47 AM, David Edelsohn wrote: >> It is unfortunate that global reviewers are so busy that they cannot >> review the few, infrequent new port submissions. But I find it very >> distasteful for someone to hyperventilate because ot

Re: Getting the ARC port reviewed and accepted

2013-10-02 Thread Andrew Haley
On 10/02/2013 12:47 AM, David Edelsohn wrote: > It is unfortunate that global reviewers are so busy that they cannot > review the few, infrequent new port submissions. But I find it very > distasteful for someone to hyperventilate because other, busy people > don't do something that appears obvious

Re: Getting the ARC port reviewed and accepted

2013-10-01 Thread David Edelsohn
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 11:23 AM, Andrew Haley wrote: > On 10/01/2013 03:19 PM, Joern Rennecke wrote: >> >> Quoting Richard Biener: >> >>> Good. So what remains is the configure parts, the libgcc parts and >>> the documentation parts. Though for all of them they look ARC >>> specific so maybe the

Re: Getting the ARC port reviewed and accepted

2013-10-01 Thread Andrew Haley
On 10/01/2013 03:19 PM, Joern Rennecke wrote: Quoting Richard Biener: Good. So what remains is the configure parts, the libgcc parts and the documentation parts. Though for all of them they look ARC specific so maybe the maintainership covers these as well. I suppose this automatism when bei

Re: Getting the ARC port reviewed and accepted

2013-10-01 Thread Jeff Law
On 10/01/13 09:23, Andrew Haley wrote: On 10/01/2013 03:19 PM, Joern Rennecke wrote: Quoting Richard Biener: Good. So what remains is the configure parts, the libgcc parts and the documentation parts. Though for all of them they look ARC specific so maybe the maintainership covers these as w

Re: Getting the ARC port reviewed and accepted

2013-10-01 Thread Joern Rennecke
Quoting Richard Biener : Good. So what remains is the configure parts, the libgcc parts and the documentation parts. Though for all of them they look ARC specific so maybe the maintainership covers these as well. I suppose this automatism when being assigned the maintainership escaped Joern a

Re: Getting the ARC port reviewed and accepted

2013-10-01 Thread Richard Biener
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 3:24 PM, Andrew Haley wrote: > On 10/01/2013 11:32 AM, Richard Biener wrote: >> >> Well, I want clarification as of whether assigning maintainership of the >> port is equivalent to getting approval for checking in the port specific >> parts. Which_I_ would think is reasona

Re: Getting the ARC port reviewed and accepted

2013-10-01 Thread Andrew Haley
On 10/01/2013 11:32 AM, Richard Biener wrote: Well, I want clarification as of whether assigning maintainership of the port is equivalent to getting approval for checking in the port specific parts. Which_I_ would think is reasonable (for the maintainer being Joern even more so). Well, sure i

Re: Getting the ARC port reviewed and accepted

2013-10-01 Thread Richard Biener
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Andrew Haley wrote: > On 10/01/2013 09:11 AM, Richard Biener wrote: >> On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 6:09 PM, Jeremy Bennett >> wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> You've probably seen that Joern Rennecke (amylaar) has been pinging >>> repeatedly for help reviewing the ARC port:

Re: Getting the ARC port reviewed and accepted

2013-10-01 Thread Andrew Haley
On 10/01/2013 09:11 AM, Richard Biener wrote: > On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 6:09 PM, Jeremy Bennett > wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> You've probably seen that Joern Rennecke (amylaar) has been pinging >> repeatedly for help reviewing the ARC port: >> >> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-09/msg02072.ht

Re: Getting the ARC port reviewed and accepted

2013-10-01 Thread Richard Biener
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 6:09 PM, Jeremy Bennett wrote: > Hi all, > > You've probably seen that Joern Rennecke (amylaar) has been pinging > repeatedly for help reviewing the ARC port: > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-09/msg02072.html > > Joern is approved as a maintainer, and the tests