On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 3:24 PM, Andrew Haley <a...@redhat.com> wrote: > On 10/01/2013 11:32 AM, Richard Biener wrote: >> >> Well, I want clarification as of whether assigning maintainership of the >> port is equivalent to getting approval for checking in the port specific >> parts. Which_I_ would think is reasonable (for the maintainer being >> Joern even more so). > > > Well, sure it is. If Joern is the maintainer he don't need anyone else > to approve his patches to his own port.
Good. So what remains is the configure parts, the libgcc parts and the documentation parts. Though for all of them they look ARC specific so maybe the maintainership covers these as well. I suppose this automatism when being assigned the maintainership escaped Joern as well ... ;) Richard. > Andrew. >
