This has nothing to do with the development of gcc, so please take it
elsewhere.
2007/5/16, J.C. Pizarro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
For instance, this tuple stored in the memory's cell of the user
process gives an idea
* number of quantum's subcontext: long64
* moment of time that the subcontext started: long64 (CPU cycles, from RDTSC)
* (optional) moment subcontext sta
2007/5/16, Joe Buck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, May 16, 2007 at 12:02:57AM +0200, J.C. Pizarro wrote:
> 2007/5/15, Joe Buck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [ explanation of why gprof is as it is ]
> It's not well reasoned.
If you don't like my explanation, feel free to rewrite the software;
On 5/15/07, Joe Buck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, May 16, 2007 at 12:02:57AM +0200, J.C. Pizarro wrote:
> 2007/5/15, Joe Buck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [ explanation of why gprof is as it is ]
> It's not well reasoned.
If you don't like my explanation, feel free to rewrite the software;
On Wed, May 16, 2007 at 12:02:57AM +0200, J.C. Pizarro wrote:
> 2007/5/15, Joe Buck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [ explanation of why gprof is as it is ]
> It's not well reasoned.
If you don't like my explanation, feel free to rewrite the software;
it is free software after all. This list usually
2007/5/15, Joe Buck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, May 15, 2007 at 10:32:09PM +0200, J.C. Pizarro wrote:
> For the current trunk of GCC, thinking about
> the related thing of gprof and option -pg of GCC,
>
> it's important to output correctly the data with non-fatal accuracy,
> preferably 4 d
On Tue, May 15, 2007 at 10:32:09PM +0200, J.C. Pizarro wrote:
> For the current trunk of GCC, thinking about
> the related thing of gprof and option -pg of GCC,
>
> it's important to output correctly the data with non-fatal accuracy,
> preferably 4 digits decimal instead of 2, e.g 0. ms instea
2007/5/15, J.C. Pizarro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amdahl's_law
It's a wrong link, the next is the correct
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amdahl%27s_law
