On 5/15/07, Joe Buck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, May 16, 2007 at 12:02:57AM +0200, J.C. Pizarro wrote:
> 2007/5/15, Joe Buck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [ explanation of why gprof is as it is ]
> It's not well reasoned.
If you don't like my explanation, feel free to rewrite the software;
it is free software after all. This list usually responds even to
good ideas with "patches welcome", meaning that it is up to the
proposer to do the work.
I'm not going to engage you in further discussion.
Of course gprof is unrelated to GCC except for the call to mcount that
GCC is able to emit so this is offtopic at best.
-- Pinski
