Re: DF-branch benchmarking on SPEC2000

2007-04-23 Thread Vladimir Makarov
Vladimir Makarov wrote: I've promised to make more thorough and accurate comparison of df-branch and mainline on last merge point to the branch. The df-branch compiler does not include sunday's Steven's patch which uses a separate obstack for df bitmaps. It does not change code but it can spe

Re: DF-branch benchmarking on SPEC2000

2007-04-23 Thread Steven Bosscher
On 4/23/07, Seongbae Park <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: As for the perlbmk slowdown on P4. my initial guess is that it might be due to cross-jumping or block ordering - those are things I noticed the dataflow branch generates slightly different code than mainline. I didn't try to narrow down where

Re: DF-branch benchmarking on SPEC2000

2007-04-23 Thread Seongbae Park
On 4/23/07, Vladimir Makarov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ... To improve the scores I'd recommend to pay attention to big degradation in SPEC score: 9% perlbmk degradation on Pentium4 3% fma3d degradation on Core2 3% eon and art degradation on Itanium 3% gap and wupwise degradation on PPC64. V