Vladimir Makarov wrote:

 I've promised to make more thorough and accurate comparison of
df-branch and mainline on last merge point to the branch.  The
df-branch compiler does not include sunday's Steven's patch which uses
a separate obstack for df bitmaps.  It does not change code but it can
speedup the df-branch compiler (I'll do compilation time measurement
of the branch with the patch later on this week).

Here the result of how last Steven's patch affects compilation times.

SpecInt2000:

X864_64
without the patch
150.23user 14.31system 3:23.17elapsed 80%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k
with the patch
149.97user 14.28system 3:26.54elapsed 79%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k

Itanium
without the patch
487.33user 14.10system 9:18.45elapsed 89%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k
with the patch
487.30user 14.20system 9:27.26elapsed 88%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k

PPC64
without the patch
408.67user 32.05system 7:42.78elapsed 95%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k
with the patch
409.13user 31.94system 7:57.40elapsed 92%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k

Pentium4
without the patch
275.23user 22.49system 5:31.34elapsed 89%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k
with the patch
275.40user 22.67system 6:02.62elapsed 82%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k


SPECFP2000:

X86_64
without the patch
113.24user 8.43system 2:24.88elapsed 83%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k
with the patch
113.02user 7.96system 2:19.89elapsed 86%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k

Itanium
without the patch
412.67user 10.47system 7:33.24elapsed 93%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k
with the patch
412.52user 9.52system 7:36.70elapsed 92%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k

PPC64
without the patch
329.11user 24.04system 6:05.33elapsed 96%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k
with the patch
327.45user 22.14system 6:06.81elapsed 95%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k

Pentium4
without the patch
201.78user 13.76system 3:57.78elapsed 90%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k
with the patch
200.08user 14.13system 4:05.18elapsed 87%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k


Reply via email to