On Fri, Nov 18, 2005 at 01:19:14AM +0100, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> BTW the gomp-branch adds 22 (!) new tree codes, just like that,
> for all languages. This is IMHO very unfair to other projects
> in need of extra tree codes.
Yeah, well, I don't see any way around it. We'll have to
solve the bi
On Thursday 17 November 2005 16:55, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> On Thursday 17 November 2005 16:51, Dorit Naishlos wrote:
> > only thing I can suggest in the context of the vectorizer is to use an
> > extra argument to save a few tree-codes:
>
> I don't think that this is a good idea. If we are going
On Thursday 17 November 2005 16:51, Dorit Naishlos wrote:
> only thing I can suggest in the context of the vectorizer is to use an
> extra argument to save a few tree-codes:
I don't think that this is a good idea. If we are going to need
more tree codes, we're just going to have to figure out a w
Paul Brook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 11/16/2005 05:03:47 PM:
> On Wednesday 16 November 2005 14:35, Dorit Naishlos wrote:
> > We're going to commit to autovect-branch vectorization support for
> > non-unit-stride accesses.
> > We'd like to suggest a few new tree-codes/optabs in order to exp
Steven Bosscher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 11/16/2005 10:39:24 PM:
> On Wednesday 16 November 2005 15:35, Dorit Naishlos wrote:
> > We'd like to suggest a few new tree-codes/optabs in order to express
the
> > extraction and merging of elements from/to vectors.
>
> Watch out for tree code sta
On 11/16/05, Steven Bosscher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wednesday 16 November 2005 15:35, Dorit Naishlos wrote:
> > We'd like to suggest a few new tree-codes/optabs in order to express the
> > extraction and merging of elements from/to vectors.
>
> Watch out for tree code starvation:
>
> $ ~/d
On Wednesday 16 November 2005 15:35, Dorit Naishlos wrote:
> We'd like to suggest a few new tree-codes/optabs in order to express the
> extraction and merging of elements from/to vectors.
Watch out for tree code starvation:
$ ~/devel/gomp-branch/gcc> grep ^DEFTREECODE *.def | wc
181 908
On Wednesday 16 November 2005 14:35, Dorit Naishlos wrote:
> We're going to commit to autovect-branch vectorization support for
> non-unit-stride accesses.
> We'd like to suggest a few new tree-codes/optabs in order to express the
> extraction and merging of elements from/to vectors.
> Background:
