On Thursday 17 November 2005 16:55, Steven Bosscher wrote: > On Thursday 17 November 2005 16:51, Dorit Naishlos wrote: > > only thing I can suggest in the context of the vectorizer is to use an > > extra argument to save a few tree-codes: > > I don't think that this is a good idea. If we are going to need > more tree codes, we're just going to have to figure out a way to > make it possible to have more tree codes, e.g. by cleaning up 8 > of the 24 bits reserved for various flags, and make the field for > the tree code 16 bits.
BTW the gomp-branch adds 22 (!) new tree codes, just like that, for all languages. This is IMHO very unfair to other projects in need of extra tree codes. Gr. Steven