Dear Deepak,
It's an Open Source Compiler for C
Thank & Regards
(MOHD KASHIF)
On Fri, Jun 28, 2024, 9:17 PM MR DEEPAK via Gcc wrote:
> Sir,
> I am a student of class 11th . I want to know original C compiler is open
> or closed source.
>
> Like I talk about :- preprocessor
>
Sir,
I am a student of class 11th . I want to know original C compiler is open
or closed source.
Like I talk about :- preprocessor
Compiler
Aasembler etc
I hope you can help meπ₯Ί
Hi Jonathan,
Thank you very much for your response.
Since the previous email I have had more correspondence with Marc at
the OpenBSD misc mailing list.
He clarified that the reason the -L/usr/lib prefix was added, was
"because of ld.ldd, the linker from clang. see, that one does not link
with /u
On Wed, 3 Mar 2021 at 12:35, Bob via Gcc wrote:
>
> Hi GCC users mailing list,
>
> I am currently figuring out a GCC usecase on OpenBSD. This situation
> involves some non-superficial understanding of GCC's code, and
> therefore I wish to query you here even in the situation that it turns
> out no
Hi GCC users mailing list,
I am currently figuring out a GCC usecase on OpenBSD. This situation
involves some non-superficial understanding of GCC's code, and
therefore I wish to query you here even in the situation that it turns
out not to be needed.
I describe my problem here:
https://marc.info
I finally understand what i did wrong! i`m just recompile gcc into one folder,
and use binaries from another because of mistake in folder while configure
re-make, of course it did not work, just lost two weeks and bother two
wonderful people!!! thank to you all very much!! and sorry for my eng
On Mon, May 6, 2019 at 6:02 AM ΠΠ»Π΅ΠΊΡΠ΅ΠΉ Π₯ΠΈΠ»Π°Π΅Π² via gcc wrote:
> Gcc riscv won`t emit my insns, binutils and spike(riscv sim) work correctly,
> but gcc don`t. I want to add min/max for integer, gcc compiling correct, sim
> executing correctly.
> (define_insn "*min_"
> [(set (match_operand:GPR 0 "r
On Mon, May 06, 2019 at 04:01:58PM +0300, ΠΠ»Π΅ΠΊοΏ½1557147755οΏ½ΠΉ Π₯ΠΈΠ»Π°Π΅Π² via gcc
wrote:
> Gcc riscv won`t emit my insns, binutils and spike(riscv sim) work correctly,
> but gcc don`t. I want to add min/max for integer, gcc compiling correct, sim
> executing correctly.
>
> (define_insn "*min_"
> [(set
Gcc riscv won`t emit my insns, binutils and spike(riscv sim) work correctly,
but gcc don`t. I want to add min/max for integer, gcc compiling correct, sim
executing correctly.
(define_insn "*min_"
[(set (match_operand:GPR 0 "register_operand" "=r")
(smin:GPR (match_operand:X 1 "register_operand"
Hi David,
I am very much thankful to you as your answer worked wonders for me.
The problem with the plugin is solved now. Thanks again.
On 3/5/14, David Malcolm wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-03-05 at 21:58 +0530, Mohsin Khan wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am developing plugins for the GCC-4.8.2. I am a newbie
On Wed, 2014-03-05 at 21:58 +0530, Mohsin Khan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am developing plugins for the GCC-4.8.2. I am a newbie in plugins.
> I wrote a plugin and tried to count and see the Goto Statements using
> the gimple_stmt_iterator. I get gimple statements printed on my
> stdout, but I am not abl
Hi,
I am developing plugins for the GCC-4.8.2. I am a newbie in plugins.
I wrote a plugin and tried to count and see the Goto Statements using
the gimple_stmt_iterator. I get gimple statements printed on my
stdout, but I am not able to find the line which has goto statements.
I only get other lin
On Fri, 28 Jan 2011, Basile Starynkevitch wrote:
> I am not sure to understand the technical ways to modify that; is CVS
> still mandatory?
Yes, the web pages reside in CVS. Not a lot different from SVN in
terms of operations, just `cvs update`, `cvs diff`, `cvs commit` instead
of the same svn co
On Jan 28, 2011, at 8:04 AM, Laurynas Biveinis wrote:
> 2011/1/28 Basile Starynkevitch :
>>> Its intention is to mention noteworthy internal changes, i.e. changes
>>> interesting for, say, maintainers of backends/frontends outside the
>>> tree, and of course plugin developers upgrading from 4.5 t
Basile Starynkevitch writes:
> I am not sure to understand what is the social rules to modify that. I
> suppose that any patch to that page should be approved with the same
> strong process as patches to trunk code?
I would say that any gcc maintainer may update the changes file without
explicit
2011/1/28 Basile Starynkevitch :
>> Its intention is to mention noteworthy internal changes, i.e. changes
>> interesting for, say, maintainers of backends/frontends outside the
>> tree, and of course plugin developers upgrading from 4.5 to 4.6.
>>
>
>
> I am not sure to understand what is the socia
On Fri, 28 Jan 2011 14:43:28 +0200
Laurynas Biveinis wrote:
> I have just added a new section (approved by Gerald) to the bottom of
> http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.6/changes.html
>
> Its intention is to mention noteworthy internal changes, i.e. changes
> interesting for, say, maintainers of backends/
I have just added a new section (approved by Gerald) to the bottom of
http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.6/changes.html
Its intention is to mention noteworthy internal changes, i.e. changes
interesting for, say, maintainers of backends/frontends outside the
tree, and of course plugin developers upgrading fr
Hello All,
I apparently have a makefile bug (the bug is mine, not of make!) in
the GCC MELT branch, only when using it for plugin.
In case you want to help me, here are the gory details
First, read http://gcc-melt.org/ & http://gcc-melt.org/leaflet.html &
http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/MELT for the co
The power7 stuff should be fairly stable at this point, and I feel it is time
to submit it to the mainline GCC. If other powerpc users can try out the
branch to see if there are regressions, it would be helpful.
Note with the recent gimple type validation errors, the mainline now has more
failure
6000-c.o main.o libbackend.a
> ../libiberty/libiberty.a
> /opt/WindRiver/gnu/3.4.4-wrlinux-1.3
/x86-linux2/bin/../lib/gcc/powerpc-wrs-
> linux-gnu/3.4.4/../../../../powerpc-wrs-linux-gnu/bin/ld:
> crt1.o: No such file: No such file or directory
> collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
> make[1]: *** [cc1] Error 1
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/ashok/gcc_build/gcc'
> make: *** [all-gcc] Error 2
>
--
>
> This is how i configured :
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] gcc_build]# ../gcc-3.4.4/configure --host=ppc-linux
> --target=ppc-linux --build=i386-linux
>
> This is how i set my cross-compiler :
> export
> PATH=$PATH:/opt/WindRiver/gnu/3.4.4-wrlinux-1.3
/x86-linux2/powerpc-wrs-linux-gnu/bin
> export CC=powerpc-wrs-linux-gnu-ppc7400-glibc_cgl-gcc
> export CXX=powerpc-wrs-linux-gnu-ppc7400-glibc_cgl-g++
> export LD=powerpc-wrs-linux-gnu-ppc7400-glibc_cgl-ld
> export NM=powerpc-wrs-linux-gnu-ppc7400-glibc_cgl-nm
> export AR=powerpc-wrs-linux-gnu-ppc7400-glibc_cgl-ar
> export AS=powerpc-wrs-linux-gnu-ppc7400-glibc_cgl-as
> export CPP=powerpc-wrs-linux-gnu-ppc7400-glibc_cgl-cpp
>
>
> Please help me where i'm wrong
>
> Thanks
> Ashok
>
>
>
.4.4-wrlinux-1.3/x86-linux2/bin/../lib/gcc/powerpc-wrs-linux-gnu/3.4.4/../../../../powerpc-wrs-linux-gnu/bin/ld:
crt1.o: No such file: No such file or directory
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make[1]: *** [cc1] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/ashok/gcc_build/gcc'
make: *** [all-gcc] Error 2
--
This is how i configured :
[EMAIL PROTECTED] gcc_build]# ../gcc-3.4.4/configure --host=ppc-linux
--target=ppc-linux --build=i386-linux
This is how i set my cross-compiler :
export
PATH=$PATH:/opt/WindRiver/gnu/3.4.4-wrlinux-1.3/x86-linux2/powerpc-wrs-linux-gnu/bin
export CC=powerpc-wrs-linux-gnu-ppc7400-glibc_cgl-gcc
export CXX=powerpc-wrs-linux-gnu-ppc7400-glibc_cgl-g++
export LD=powerpc-wrs-linux-gnu-ppc7400-glibc_cgl-ld
export NM=powerpc-wrs-linux-gnu-ppc7400-glibc_cgl-nm
export AR=powerpc-wrs-linux-gnu-ppc7400-glibc_cgl-ar
export AS=powerpc-wrs-linux-gnu-ppc7400-glibc_cgl-as
export CPP=powerpc-wrs-linux-gnu-ppc7400-glibc_cgl-cpp
Please help me where i'm wrong
Thanks
Ashok
Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
Unfortunately support for the Intel i960 was dropped in gcc 4.0.
There is no way to generate i960 code with a recent gcc release.
which means that GNAT is also unavailable at this stage.
"sameer sinha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Please can any one tell me how to bulid gcc newer version for
> generating
> code for i960MC processor.
> is there any switch to generate coed for i960MC or i will
> have to build it first
> for target i960.
>
hello,
Please can any one tell me how to bulid gcc newer version for
generating
code for i960MC processor.
is there any switch to generate coed for i960MC or i will
have to build it first
for target i960.
Right now i am using Linux i686.Pleasee help me.
Naren KN wrote:
Hi Nathan,
I was unable to find such a function in my source tree. I'm using the
4.0.2 version. Are you talking about the trunk version?
sorry, walk_namespaces in cp/decl.c
nathan
--
Nathan Sidwell:: http://www.codesourcery.com :: CodeSourcery
[EMAIL PROTEC
Naren KN wrote:
Hi Nathan,
Please copy the gcc list on these things.
I was asking this question and didn't get much reply.. regarding the
c++ frontend ... After calling the c_parse_file(), I wish to walk
through the list of namespaces, inturn all the classes and functions
inside them... c
On May 17, 2006, at 4:32 PM, fsshl plinlin wrote:
Union-Souths-Computer:~/Developer/usr/local/bin UnionSouth$ ./gcc
../../../try.cgcc: error trying to exec 'cc1': execvp: No such file or
directory
This list is for developers of gcc. You should be using gcc-help.
FWIW you need more than jus
Union-Souths-Computer:~/Developer/usr/local/bin UnionSouth$ ./gcc
../../../try.cgcc: error trying to exec 'cc1': execvp: No such file or
directory
On May 7, 2006, at 5:06 PM, fsshl plinlin wrote:
dear gcc:
when I try to install gcc 4.0 at my apple mac os X , 7.9.0 (by uname
-r),
when I ./configure
it reply error as no acceptable cc found in $PATH
if that need c compiler be install, please tell where, (if binary ,
please indicate th
dear gcc:
when I try to install gcc 4.0 at my apple mac os X , 7.9.0 (by uname
-r),
when I ./configure
it reply error as no acceptable cc found in $PATH
if that need c compiler be install, please tell where, (if binary ,
please indicate the one not through MAC installer)?
thanks your help i
Renju Anand wrote:
I'm facing compilation problem during GCC( 3.2.2 ) installation
in LynxOS under x86 platform.
You didn't say what kind of problems you ran into. Without details, we
can't really help.
I can say that, historically, the LynxOS support in FSF gcc has been
poor, and unlike
Hi
I'm facing compilation problem during GCC( 3.2.2 ) installation
in LynxOS under x86 platform. Is there any specific options for
gcc installation configuration under LynxOS ?. Any modifications
needed for compilation?. If anyone experiences these problems
before plz help me with the deta
wrong one as it
wont work, and also I dont know how to create a directory. Please help
me. Thanks for your time. Louise Kelliher
On Tue, Jul 26, 2005 at 10:16:48AM -0400, Dimitry Golubovsky wrote:
> Dimitry Golubovsky wrote:
>
> > I need to declare a symbol which is weaker in the executable than in any
> > external static or dynamic library.
>
> > In other words, the executable provides some fallback function
> > implement
Dimitry Golubovsky wrote:
> I need to declare a symbol which is weaker in the executable than in any
> external static or dynamic library.
> In other words, the executable provides some fallback function
> implementation (in my example, for "write"). But if the linker or
> dynamic linker resolves
On Tue, Jul 26, 2005 at 07:19:43AM -0400, Dimitry Golubovsky wrote:
>
> I need to declare a symbol which is weaker in the executable than in any
> external static or dynamic library.
>
> In other words, the executable provides some fallback function
> implementation (in my example, for "write").
I need to declare a symbol which is weaker in the executable than in any
external static or dynamic library.
In other words, the executable provides some fallback function
implementation (in my example, for "write"). But if the linker or
dynamic linker resolves it, the symbol definition from an
:12 PM
To: Prafulla Shukla
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: Please help ...
On Fri, 3 Jun 2005, Prafulla Shukla wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We require
> gcc version 3.2.3 20030502 (Red Hat Linux 3.2.3-20)
^^^
What about to try www.redhat.com ?
> This e-m
On Fri, 3 Jun 2005, Prafulla Shukla wrote:
Hi,
We require
gcc version 3.2.3 20030502 (Red Hat Linux 3.2.3-20)
^^^
What about to try www.redhat.com ?
This e-mail message may contain proprietary, confidential or legally
privileged information for the sole use
Hi,
We require
gcc version 3.2.3 20030502 (Red Hat Linux 3.2.3-20)
on Intel Itanium2.
Please let us know where can I get this.
Thanks and Regards,
Prafulla Shukla,
ISV,
Patni, Pune,
(W): +91 20 3984 4206
(W): +91 20 3984 4000 (X 4206)
http://www.patni.com
World-Wide Partnerships. World-Class
R Lokesh babu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> My application (COMMERCIAL SOFTWARE) links to
> libstdc++, By default Solaris OS
> does not install the libstdc++ package
> (libgcc-3.3-sol9-sparc-local.gz).
> Can I re-distribute the lib-gcc package and install it
> along with my application
> installat
Hello,
My application (COMMERCIAL SOFTWARE) links to
libstdc++, By default Solaris OS
does not install the libstdc++ package
(libgcc-3.3-sol9-sparc-local.gz).
Can I re-distribute the lib-gcc package and install it
along with my application
installation. (Is it a violation of GPL?) :)
Or should my I
43 matches
Mail list logo
