On Feb 18, 2005, at 9:58 AM, R. D. Flowers wrote:
If this is supposed to be a list of SOME primes, no problem.
If it is supposed to be a list of ALL primes up to that size, YES a
problem.
It is supposed to be a list of some primes less than 2^32. A list of
all primes up to that size would be too
Subject:
PATCH: TR1 unordered associative containers
From:
Matt Austern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date:
Thu, 17 Feb 2005 15:47:03 -0800
To:
libstdc++ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, gcc mailing list
To:
libstdc++ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, gcc mailing list
+ template
+ const unsigned long X::p
Matt Austern wrote:
By the way, it's up to you what to do exactly with libstdc++/19554...
I think I agree with you: no point in fixing enhancement requests in
obsolete components
Fine, I closed it as WONTFIX (the audit trail explains sufficiently
clearly, in my opinion, what WONTFIX means in this
On Feb 17, 2005, at 3:57 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
Hi Matt,
I'm sure there are still lots of horrible bugs, which will only be
found with a more complete test suite. But the core functionality
works, and at this point I think it'll improve faster in the CVS
server than sitting on my hard disk
On Feb 17, 2005, at 4:03 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
Matt Austern wrote:
OK to commit to mainline?
... before going to sleep, two very simple, slighlty less enthusiastic
comments ;)
1- Please add 2005 to the copyrights.
Fixed.
2- I see that the table of primes assumes that unsigned long is
32-bit: w
On Feb 17, 2005, at 4:18 PM, Joe Buck wrote:
On Thu, Feb 17, 2005 at 03:47:03PM -0800, Matt Austern wrote:
I'm sure there are still lots of horrible bugs, which will only be
found with a more complete test suite. But the core functionality
works, and at this point I think it'll improve faster in t
Joe Buck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Thu, Feb 17, 2005 at 03:47:03PM -0800, Matt Austern wrote:
| > I'm sure there are still lots of horrible bugs, which will only be
| > found with a more complete test suite. But the core functionality
| > works, and at this point I think it'll improve
Joe Buck wrote:
> >A namespace purity nitpick:
> >
> >You define a macro named tr1_hashtable_define_trivial_hash. Shouldn't
> >that be __tr1_hashtable_define_trivial_hash or something similar?
On Fri, Feb 18, 2005 at 12:23:12AM +, Chris Jefferson wrote:
> Having just read through, everything
Joe Buck wrote:
On Thu, Feb 17, 2005 at 03:47:03PM -0800, Matt Austern wrote:
I'm sure there are still lots of horrible bugs, which will only be
found with a more complete test suite. But the core functionality
works, and at this point I think it'll improve faster in the CVS server
than s
On Thu, Feb 17, 2005 at 03:47:03PM -0800, Matt Austern wrote:
> I'm sure there are still lots of horrible bugs, which will only be
> found with a more complete test suite. But the core functionality
> works, and at this point I think it'll improve faster in the CVS server
> than sitting on m
Matt Austern wrote:
OK to commit to mainline?
About your rethoric question: you made the mistake of creating the CVS
dirs before actually asking, thus making the nice surprise a little less
effective ;) ;)
Paolo.
> I'm sure there are still lots of horrible bugs, which will only be
> found with a more complete test suite. But the core functionality
> works, and at this point I think it'll improve faster in the CVS server
> than sitting on my hard disk.
Yep.
> OK to commit to mainline?
Sounds like
Matt Austern wrote:
OK to commit to mainline?
... before going to sleep, two very simple, slighlty less enthusiastic
comments ;)
1- Please add 2005 to the copyrights.
2- I see that the table of primes assumes that unsigned long is 32-bit:
we should do something about this, sooner or later...
Pao
On Feb 17, 2005, at 3:47 PM, Matt Austern wrote:
I'm sure there are still lots of horrible bugs
OK to commit to mainline?
Please, the copyright seems wrong. I think that should be fixed before
it goes in.
Hi Matt,
I'm sure there are still lots of horrible bugs, which will only be
found with a more complete test suite. But the core functionality
works, and at this point I think it'll improve faster in the CVS
server than sitting on my hard disk.
OK to commit to mainline?
As far as I'm concern
15 matches
Mail list logo
