Re: GCC 4.4 Branch Created

2009-03-31 Thread Gabriel Dos Reis
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 2:05 PM, Daniel Berlin wrote: > On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 3:01 PM, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote: >> On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 1:51 PM, Rainer Orth >> wrote: >>> Daniel Berlin writes: >> >>> Understood, but I wonder how other projects deal with this.  I cannot >>> possibly be the on

Re: GCC 4.4 Branch Created

2009-03-31 Thread Daniel Berlin
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 3:01 PM, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote: > On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 1:51 PM, Rainer Orth > wrote: >> Daniel Berlin writes: > >> Understood, but I wonder how other projects deal with this.  I cannot >> possibly be the only one in the world who wants to submit structured bug >> repor

Re: GCC 4.4 Branch Created

2009-03-31 Thread Gabriel Dos Reis
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 1:51 PM, Rainer Orth wrote: > Daniel Berlin writes: > Understood, but I wonder how other projects deal with this.  I cannot > possibly be the only one in the world who wants to submit structured bug > reports by mail. No, you are not the only one. Unless my memory is fai

Re: GCC 4.4 Branch Created

2009-03-31 Thread Daniel Berlin
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 2:51 PM, Rainer Orth wrote: > Daniel Berlin writes: > >> >  I don't blame you at all, but find it highly >> > unfortunate to be forced to use a browser for initial submission instead of >> > being able to use a proper mailer/editor. >> I'm sorry you feel that way, but I si

Re: GCC 4.4 Branch Created

2009-03-31 Thread Rainer Orth
Daniel Berlin writes: > > No wonder: it didn't work for quite some time (reports didn't make it > > through), and despite several request from me you couldn't make time to > > find out what was going on. > > This is true, I don't have time to maintain an incoming email script > used solely by you

Re: GCC 4.4 Branch Created

2009-03-31 Thread Daniel Berlin
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 2:46 PM, Rainer Orth wrote: > Daniel Berlin writes: > >> On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 6:34 PM, Joseph S. Myers >> wrote: >> > On Fri, 27 Mar 2009, Mark Mitchell wrote: > [...] >> > If we want to deprecate gccbug in 4.4 and remove it in 4.5 (and so not >> > need 4.5.1 or subseq

Re: GCC 4.4 Branch Created

2009-03-31 Thread Rainer Orth
Daniel Berlin writes: > On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 6:34 PM, Joseph S. Myers > wrote: > > On Fri, 27 Mar 2009, Mark Mitchell wrote: [...] > > If we want to deprecate gccbug in 4.4 and remove it in 4.5 (and so not > > need 4.5.1 or subsequent versions in this script), there is still time to > > do so

Re: GCC 4.4 Branch Created

2009-03-29 Thread Joe Buck
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 09:48:19AM -0700, Mark Mitchell wrote: > Jakub Jelinek wrote: > > >> Technically Stage 4 is the same as release branch status (just without > >> branching > >> before). But indeed, we should update develop.html - does this need to go > >> via > >> the SC? > > > > We shou

Re: GCC 4.4 Branch Created

2009-03-29 Thread Joseph S. Myers
On Sun, 29 Mar 2009, Daniel Berlin wrote: > On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 11:27 AM, Joseph S. Myers > wrote: > > On Fri, 27 Mar 2009, Mark Mitchell wrote: > > > >> The tasks that remain from branching.html are: > > > > I believe everything needed for starting the new release branch is now > > done apar

Re: GCC 4.4 Branch Created

2009-03-29 Thread Daniel Berlin
On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 11:27 AM, Joseph S. Myers wrote: > On Fri, 27 Mar 2009, Mark Mitchell wrote: > >> The tasks that remain from branching.html are: > > I believe everything needed for starting the new release branch is now > done apart from this: > >> 13. Asking Danny Berlin to adjust PRs. >

Re: GCC 4.4 Branch Created

2009-03-29 Thread Joseph S. Myers
On Sat, 28 Mar 2009, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 11:20:35AM +0100, Richard Guenther wrote: > > On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 9:01 AM, Eric Botcazou > > wrote: > > >> I have done this, and applied this patch to reflect that submitting a > > >> snapshot to the TP is not necessary afte

Re: GCC 4.4 Branch Created

2009-03-29 Thread Joseph S. Myers
On Fri, 27 Mar 2009, Mark Mitchell wrote: > The tasks that remain from branching.html are: I believe everything needed for starting the new release branch is now done apart from this: > 13. Asking Danny Berlin to adjust PRs. Daniel, could you change "4.4" to "4.4/4.5" in the summaries of all o

Re: GCC 4.4 Branch Created

2009-03-28 Thread Mark Mitchell
Jakub Jelinek wrote: >> Technically Stage 4 is the same as release branch status (just without >> branching >> before). But indeed, we should update develop.html - does this need to go >> via >> the SC? > > We should probably drop current Stage 2 and just rename Stage 3 to Stage 2 > and Stage

Re: GCC 4.4 Branch Created

2009-03-28 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 11:20:35AM +0100, Richard Guenther wrote: > On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 9:01 AM, Eric Botcazou wrote: > >> I have done this, and applied this patch to reflect that submitting a > >> snapshot to the TP is not necessary after creating a release branch if one > >> was submitted du

Re: GCC 4.4 Branch Created

2009-03-28 Thread Richard Guenther
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 9:01 AM, Eric Botcazou wrote: >> I have done this, and applied this patch to reflect that submitting a >> snapshot to the TP is not necessary after creating a release branch if one >> was submitted during stage 3 or 4 (now we have a long stabilisation period >> on trunk and

Re: GCC 4.4 Branch Created

2009-03-28 Thread Eric Botcazou
> I have done this, and applied this patch to reflect that submitting a > snapshot to the TP is not necessary after creating a release branch if one > was submitted during stage 3 or 4 (now we have a long stabilisation period > on trunk and a comparatively short one on the branch before release, >

Re: GCC 4.4 Branch Created

2009-03-28 Thread Joseph S. Myers
On Fri, 27 Mar 2009, Mark Mitchell wrote: > 8. Regenerating .pot files. I have done this, and applied this patch to reflect that submitting a snapshot to the TP is not necessary after creating a release branch if one was submitted during stage 3 or 4 (now we have a long stabilisation period on

Re: GCC 4.4 Branch Created

2009-03-27 Thread Mark Mitchell
Daniel Berlin wrote: >> If we want to deprecate gccbug in 4.4 and remove it in 4.5 (and so not >> need 4.5.1 or subsequent versions in this script), there is still time to >> do so (though not to get it in the first deprecated-features-removal patch >> for 4.5 - that has already been approved for

Re: GCC 4.4 Branch Created

2009-03-27 Thread Daniel Berlin
On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 6:34 PM, Joseph S. Myers wrote: > On Fri, 27 Mar 2009, Mark Mitchell wrote: > >> 12. Updating the email parsing script.  AFAICT, this hasn't been done in >> a while, so I wasn't sure if it was considered obsolete. > > I have done this.  I'll deal with the snapshot and .pot

Re: GCC 4.4 Branch Created

2009-03-27 Thread Joseph S. Myers
On Fri, 27 Mar 2009, Mark Mitchell wrote: > 12. Updating the email parsing script. AFAICT, this hasn't been done in > a while, so I wasn't sure if it was considered obsolete. I have done this. I'll deal with the snapshot and .pot files later. I'll close 4.2 branch at some point after the PR s

GCC 4.4 Branch Created

2009-03-27 Thread Mark Mitchell
[Joseph, Danny, see below for request.] At long last, I have created the GCC 4.4 release branch. We are now in Stage 1 on the mainline. Please go ahead and begin checking in approved patches. Please try to coordinate so that we do not have multiple overlapping radical changes. Please announce