Jakub Jelinek wrote: >> Technically Stage 4 is the same as release branch status (just without >> branching >> before). But indeed, we should update develop.html - does this need to go >> via >> the SC? > > We should probably drop current Stage 2 and just rename Stage 3 to Stage 2 > and Stage 4 to Stage 3 as well, I think this model worked very well in 4.4.
I don't think SC approval is required. I think that the SC trusts me to approve these kinds of minor mechanical adjustments to the process (subject, of course, to the fact that people can appeal decisions they don't like to the SC). I agree that this is a good strategy. So, let's go ahead. Thanks, -- Mark Mitchell CodeSourcery m...@codesourcery.com (650) 331-3385 x713
