DF branch benchmarking on SPEC2000

2007-05-22 Thread Vladimir N. Makarov
Ken Zadeck asked me to do another round of DF branch benchmarking on SPEC2000. There is a progress on compilation speed (0.5%-1%) since last my benchmarking pratically for all platforms. Now in average code size and SPEC scores are practically the same for the mainline and the branch. To be

Re: One more df-branch benchmarking on SPEC2000

2007-05-07 Thread Steven Bosscher
On 5/7/07, Vladimir Makarov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Richard Guenther wrote: > On 5/7/07, Vladimir Makarov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> >> Compilation time SPECINT2000 (user time sec): >> **Mainline Branch Change >> >> x86_64139.39 148.48 +6.

Re: One more df-branch benchmarking on SPEC2000

2007-05-07 Thread Vladimir Makarov
Richard Guenther wrote: On 5/7/07, Vladimir Makarov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Compilation time SPECINT2000 (user time sec): **Mainline Branch Change x86_64139.39 148.48 +6.5% Itanium 446.00 484.56 +8.6% PPC64 374.33 399.72 +6.8%

Re: One more df-branch benchmarking on SPEC2000

2007-05-07 Thread Richard Guenther
On 5/7/07, Vladimir Makarov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: This is one more df-branch comparison after the last merge branch (done 05/03) with the mainline on the merge point (r124382). There is a big progress since last my benchmarking on compilation speed of SPECFP2000 for PPC64. But whatever

One more df-branch benchmarking on SPEC2000

2007-05-07 Thread Vladimir Makarov
This is one more df-branch comparison after the last merge branch (done 05/03) with the mainline on the merge point (r124382). There is a big progress since last my benchmarking on compilation speed of SPECFP2000 for PPC64. But whatever changed this does not work well for all platforms and ben

Re: DF-branch benchmarking on SPEC2000

2007-04-23 Thread Vladimir Makarov
Vladimir Makarov wrote: I've promised to make more thorough and accurate comparison of df-branch and mainline on last merge point to the branch. The df-branch compiler does not include sunday's Steven's patch which uses a separate obstack for df bitmaps. It does not change code but it can spe

Re: DF-branch benchmarking on SPEC2000

2007-04-23 Thread Steven Bosscher
On 4/23/07, Seongbae Park <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: As for the perlbmk slowdown on P4. my initial guess is that it might be due to cross-jumping or block ordering - those are things I noticed the dataflow branch generates slightly different code than mainline. I didn't try to narrow down where

Re: DF-branch benchmarking on SPEC2000

2007-04-23 Thread Seongbae Park
On 4/23/07, Vladimir Makarov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ... To improve the scores I'd recommend to pay attention to big degradation in SPEC score: 9% perlbmk degradation on Pentium4 3% fma3d degradation on Core2 3% eon and art degradation on Itanium 3% gap and wupwise degradation on PPC64. V

DF-branch benchmarking on SPEC2000

2007-04-23 Thread Vladimir Makarov
I've promised to make more thorough and accurate comparison of df-branch and mainline on last merge point to the branch. The df-branch compiler does not include sunday's Steven's patch which uses a separate obstack for df bitmaps. It does not change code but it can speedup the df-branch compile