Hello,
> Roberto COSTA wrote:
> > Andrew Pinski wrote:
> >> On Jul 14, 2006, at 11:01 PM, Roberto COSTA wrote:
> >>
> >>> Is it a bug... or am I trying to do something wrong?
> >>
> >> Why are you trying to regimplify something which is in gimple?
> >
> > I'm trying to generate new code, which ha
Roberto COSTA wrote:
> Andrew Pinski wrote:
>> On Jul 14, 2006, at 11:01 PM, Roberto COSTA wrote:
>>
>>> Is it a bug... or am I trying to do something wrong?
>>
>> Why are you trying to regimplify something which is in gimple?
>
> I'm trying to generate new code, which happens to contain TARGET_ME
Andrew Pinski wrote:
On Jul 14, 2006, at 11:01 PM, Roberto COSTA wrote:
Is it a bug... or am I trying to do something wrong?
Why are you trying to regimplify something which is in gimple?
I'm trying to generate new code, which happens to contain TARGET_MEM_REF.
To do that, I find more con
On Jul 14, 2006, at 11:01 PM, Roberto COSTA wrote:
Is it a bug... or am I trying to do something wrong?
Why are you trying to regimplify something which is in gimple?
Thanks,
Andrew Pinski
Hello,
I've just noticed that gimplify_expr () function (from gimplify.c)
asserts when trying to gimplify a TARGET_MEM_REF.
TARGET_MEM_REF nodes are generated after the gimplification pass, this
is why gimple_expr (...) doesn't expect any TARGET_MEM_REF at all.
However, gimplify_to_stmt_list