Hello, > Roberto COSTA wrote: > > Andrew Pinski wrote: > >> On Jul 14, 2006, at 11:01 PM, Roberto COSTA wrote: > >> > >>> Is it a bug... or am I trying to do something wrong? > >> > >> Why are you trying to regimplify something which is in gimple? > > > > I'm trying to generate new code, which happens to contain TARGET_MEM_REF. > > To do that, I find more convenient to generate a big and deep tree and > > to gimplify it later (I saw other passes follow this approach). > > Passes that absolutely need to do it, should, others probably shouldn't. > It generally is a waste of time and memory to do it if your pass can > simply generate piecewise GIMPLE expressions on it's own. > > Anyway, ignoring Andrew's tangent for a moment, this is a bug.
not really a bug, just the gimplifying of TARGET_MEM_REFs was not implemented (since nobody needed it so far). Zdenek
