Jeroen Scheerder writes:
> Rainer Orth (25/4/05 12:28 +0200) [Re: Built gcc 4.0.0, without C++
> support]:
>
> >> Partial success only. I think I'll be able to build it without C++
> >> support, but compilation per your instruction does choke on
> >>lib
Rainer Orth (25/4/05 12:28 +0200) [Re: Built gcc 4.0.0, without C++
support]:
>> Partial success only. I think I'll be able to build it without C++
>> support, but compilation per your instruction does choke on
>>libstdc++.so.6.0.4.
>
>I've had the same proble
> I configured/made/installed gcc 4.0.0 partially on a Solaris host. I
> could not build with C++ support, because ld (GNU ld, that is) choked
> (dumped core, signal 11, segmentation violation) on abi_check (see
> below).
> When using the Sun-supplied as and ld, ld chokes on alignment errors
> dur
Jeroen Scheerder writes:
> Note that no other combination will even bootstrap. GNU ld stumbles
> upon a Sun-supplied crt*.o file, and Sun's as chokes on the generated
> assembly (x86_64 instructions it fails to handle?).
There are several issues with the native as, discussed in
http://g
Daniel Jacobowitz:
[...]
> > Note that no other combination will even bootstrap. GNU ld stumbles
> > upon a Sun-supplied crt*.o file, and Sun's as chokes on the generated
> > assembly (x86_64 instructions it fails to handle?).
>
> GNU ld ought to work; what's the error look like?
/usr/lib/amd6
On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 05:05:32PM +0200, Jeroen Scheerder wrote:
> Daniel Jacobowitz:
>
> [...]
>
> > > So obviously Sun ld doesn't have the necessary support for COMDAT groups
> > > (even with GNU ld, a quite recent version seems to be required).
> > > Unfortunately, gcc's configure.ac doesn't
Daniel Jacobowitz writes:
> > So obviously Sun ld doesn't have the necessary support for COMDAT groups
> > (even with GNU ld, a quite recent version seems to be required).
> > Unfortunately, gcc's configure.ac doesn't check for this, but should.
>
> So you're using gas with the Sun linker? Yes,
Daniel Jacobowitz:
[...]
> > So obviously Sun ld doesn't have the necessary support for COMDAT groups
> > (even with GNU ld, a quite recent version seems to be required).
> > Unfortunately, gcc's configure.ac doesn't check for this, but should.
>
> So you're using gas with the Sun linker? Yes,
On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 12:28:18PM +0200, Rainer Orth wrote:
> If I compare stdexcept.s when building with /usr/sfw/bin/gas vs. gas
> 2.15.96, I see differences like the following:
>
> .Ltext0:
> .weak _ZTISt11logic_error
> - .section.gnu.linkonce.r._ZTISt11logic_error,"a"
Jeroen Scheerder writes:
> > So obviously Sun ld doesn't have the necessary support for COMDAT groups
> > (even with GNU ld, a quite recent version seems to be required).
> > Unfortunately, gcc's configure.ac doesn't check for this, but should.
>
> Your analysis is very convincing. So an ugly wo
Rainer Orth:
> Jeroen Scheerder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Partial success only. I think I'll be able to build it without C++
> > support, but compilation per your instruction does choke on
> > libstdc++.so.6.0.4.
>
> I've had the same problem and think I know what's going on.
>
> > ld
Jeroen Scheerder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Partial success only. I think I'll be able to build it without C++
> support, but compilation per your instruction does choke on
> libstdc++.so.6.0.4.
I've had the same problem and think I know what's going on.
> ld: fatal: relocation error: file:
"Joseph S. Myers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I recommend using GNU as and Sun ld. /usr/sfw/bin/as should be a suitable
> version of the GNU assembler, or try the 2.15.97 binutils snapshot (from
> ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/binutils/snapshots/) for an assembler which should
> also be sufficiently
Joseph S. Myers:
> On Sat, 23 Apr 2005, Jeroen Scheerder wrote:
>
> > Note that builds on Solaris 10 on AMD Opteron (on a Sun Fire V20z) failed
> > miserably. With the Sun-supplied as and ld, bootstraps chokes on syntax
> > errors in assembly files; with GNU as and ld, bootstrap chockes on
> > i
On Sat, 23 Apr 2005, Jeroen Scheerder wrote:
> Note that builds on Solaris 10 on AMD Opteron (on a Sun Fire V20z) failed
> miserably. With the Sun-supplied as and ld, bootstraps chokes on syntax
> errors in assembly files; with GNU as and ld, bootstrap chockes on
> invalid instructions (64-bit AM
I configured/made/installed gcc 4.0.0 partially on a Solaris host. I
could not build with C++ support, because ld (GNU ld, that is) choked
(dumped core, signal 11, segmentation violation) on abi_check (see
below).
When using the Sun-supplied as and ld, ld chokes on alignment errors
during bootstra
16 matches
Mail list logo
