Re: Avoiding REG+OFF memory accesses

2009-05-08 Thread Iceman
Perfect, thank you! - Original Message From: Michael Meissner To: Iceman Cc: Michael Meissner ; Ian Lance Taylor ; g...@gnu.org Sent: Friday, May 8, 2009 3:45:20 PM Subject: Re: Avoiding REG+OFF memory accesses On Fri, May 08, 2009 at 02:05:18PM -0700, Iceman wrote: > &g

Re: Avoiding REG+OFF memory accesses

2009-05-08 Thread Iceman
bject: Re: Avoiding REG+OFF memory accesses On Wed, May 06, 2009 at 05:01:33PM -0700, Ian Lance Taylor wrote: > Iceman writes: > > > Sorry for such trivial question, but is there any macro that can be used to > > avoig GCC to generate > > REG+OFF memory accesses? > >

Re: Avoiding REG+OFF memory accesses

2009-05-06 Thread Ian Lance Taylor
Iceman writes: > Sorry for such trivial question, but is there any macro that can be used to > avoig GCC to generate > REG+OFF memory accesses? > So basically to force GCC to break: > > (mem (plus (reg const_int))) > > into > > (set regtmp (plus (reg const_int))) > (set (mem regtmp) reg) > > Thi

Avoiding REG+OFF memory accesses

2009-05-06 Thread Iceman
Sorry for such trivial question, but is there any macro that can be used to avoig GCC to generate REG+OFF memory accesses? So basically to force GCC to break: (mem (plus (reg const_int))) into (set regtmp (plus (reg const_int))) (set (mem regtmp) reg) This w/out writing custom RTL. Can you pl