Perfect, thank you!
----- Original Message ---- From: Michael Meissner <[email protected]> To: Iceman <[email protected]> Cc: Michael Meissner <[email protected]>; Ian Lance Taylor <[email protected]>; [email protected] Sent: Friday, May 8, 2009 3:45:20 PM Subject: Re: Avoiding REG+OFF memory accesses On Fri, May 08, 2009 at 02:05:18PM -0700, Iceman wrote: > > Ian suggestion worked perfectly, thanks. Can you tell me the macro/function > name to look up > to work out the secondary reload you're mentioning? Look up TARGET_SECONDARY_RELOAD in the documentation. Basically it is a hook that is called and the backend can say it needs extra scratch registers for a move, or whether it needs to load a value into another register class. -- Michael Meissner, IBM 4 Technology Place Drive, MS 2203A, Westford, MA, 01886, USA [email protected]
