On Fri, 2013-03-29 at 06:13 -0700, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 1:35 AM, Matt Burgess
> wrote:
> >
> > 1) We currently assume that binutils is 'upstream' for libiberty
> > development, and should therefore 'own' the libiberty.a file. Is that
> > assumption correct?
>
> No.
On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 1:35 AM, Matt Burgess
wrote:
>
> 1) We currently assume that binutils is 'upstream' for libiberty
> development, and should therefore 'own' the libiberty.a file. Is that
> assumption correct?
No. The master sources for libiberty are in the GCC repository.
> 2) The --dis
Hi all,
libiberty.a is built and installed by a number of packages, such as
binutils, gcc, gdb. When packaging for an OS, it's desirable to only
have libiberty.a installed by one package to avoid conflicts as to which
package 'owns' the file. Related to this are the following questions:
1) We c
