On Fri, 2013-03-29 at 06:13 -0700, Ian Lance Taylor wrote: > On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 1:35 AM, Matt Burgess > <matt...@linuxfromscratch.org> wrote: > > > > 1) We currently assume that binutils is 'upstream' for libiberty > > development, and should therefore 'own' the libiberty.a file. Is that > > assumption correct? > > No. The master sources for libiberty are in the GCC repository.
OK, thanks, that's useful to know. > > 2) The --disable-install-libiberty configure switch for GCC does *not* > > suppress the installation of libiberty.a (see also [0] and [1]). > > I agree that --disable-install-libiberty should prevent installing > libiberty.a. This would then be a GCC bug. Thanks for confirming. This is now http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56780. Regards, Matt.
