On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 11:15 PM, Tobias Grosser
wrote:
> Hi folks, hi graphities,
>
> here you are with the latest notes from our graphite phone call.
>
> It is also available on the wiki:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/Graphite_Phone_Call/2009_05_06
>
> All the best
>
> Tobi
>
>
> Attendees: Sebasti
Hi folks, hi graphities,
here you are with the latest notes from our graphite phone call.
It is also available on the wiki:
http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/Graphite_Phone_Call/2009_05_06
All the best
Tobi
Attendees: Sebastian, Tobias, Christophe, Albert, Li, Jan, Razya,
Konrad, Antoniu
* Seb
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 2:53 PM, Albert Cohen wrote:
> I believe the short-cut proposed by Sebastian makes sense. We never go out
> of SSA, just the hard-to-maintain-in-SSA induction variables are converted
> temporarily into single-element arrays. This of course is only a quick fix,
> and it does
Sebastian Pop wrote:
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 17:15, Richard Guenther
wrote:
I don't see how SSA form makes anything more complicated ;)
One of the difficulties was regenerating the phi nodes after code
hoisting: CLooG optimizes
for (i)
if (invariant of i)
s += A[i];
into
if (invaria
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 17:15, Richard Guenther
wrote:
> I don't see how SSA form makes anything more complicated ;)
>
One of the difficulties was regenerating the phi nodes after code
hoisting: CLooG optimizes
for (i)
if (invariant of i)
s += A[i];
into
if (invariant of i)
for (i)
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 6:19 PM, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 12:15 AM, Richard Guenther
> wrote:
>> Well, the challenge is to retain the per SSA name information across
>> Graphite. At some point we need to stop re-computing points-to
>> information because we cannot do so w
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 12:15 AM, Richard Guenther
wrote:
> Well, the challenge is to retain the per SSA name information across
> Graphite. At some point we need to stop re-computing points-to
> information because we cannot do so with retaining IPA results.
Not to mention the compile time pain
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 12:06 AM, Tobias Grosser
wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-04-29 at 23:57 +0200, Richard Guenther wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 11:34 PM, Tobias Grosser
>> wrote:
>> > Hi gcc developers, hi graphities
>> >
>> > here are some notes from our weekly phone call. Unfortunately I missed
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 16:57, Richard Guenther
wrote:
>>
>> * Reductions: Diego OK with going out of SSA.
>
> You will loose all points-to information. I think going out of SSA is
> a very bad idea.
>
There is no loss of information: we go out of SSA only for scalar phi
nodes that cannot b
On Wed, 2009-04-29 at 23:57 +0200, Richard Guenther wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 11:34 PM, Tobias Grosser
> wrote:
> > Hi gcc developers, hi graphities
> >
> > here are some notes from our weekly phone call. Unfortunately I missed
> > to send out the notes from the last two phone calls, but I
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 11:34 PM, Tobias Grosser
wrote:
> Hi gcc developers, hi graphities
>
> here are some notes from our weekly phone call. Unfortunately I missed
> to send out the notes from the last two phone calls, but I hope to get
> them out more regulary. Believe in me! ;-)
>
> http://gcc
Hi gcc developers, hi graphities
here are some notes from our weekly phone call. Unfortunately I missed
to send out the notes from the last two phone calls, but I hope to get
them out more regulary. Believe in me! ;-)
http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/Graphite_Phone_Call/2009_04_29
Attendees: Li, Jan, Kon
12 matches
Mail list logo
