On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 11:34 PM, Tobias Grosser
<gros...@fim.uni-passau.de> wrote:
> Hi gcc developers, hi graphities
>
> here are some notes from our weekly phone call. Unfortunately I missed
> to send out the notes from the last two phone calls, but I hope to get
> them out more regulary. Believe in me! ;-)
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/Graphite_Phone_Call/2009_04_29
>
> Attendees: Li, Jan, Konrad, Sebastian, Tobias, David, Christophe
>
>      * Reductions: Diego OK with going out of SSA.

You will loose all points-to information.  I think going out of SSA is
a very bad idea.

Richard.

>              * Patch not yet ready. The higher code coverage exposes an
>                IVSTACK bug.
>      * IVStack: Sebastian is working on removing it
>      * Data dependence analysis: Committed to graphite branch.
>              * Not yet enabled, as the data reference still does not
>                bootstrap. The lexicographic smaller than constraint is
>                not yet added. This is not wrong but very conservative.
>                Dependence test should be enabled with
>                -fgraphite-identity.
>      * Loop transformations: We need some simple transformations to
>        check data dependency analysis.
>              * Pranav? We did not hear anything yet.
>      * Data reference: Last bugs have to be fixed.
>              * Not yet enabled. Blocks data dependence analysis.
>      * PCP:
>              * Jan Implemented simplification/canonicalization for
>                expressions. This will allow a systematic translation of
>                expressions to constraints. Jan will work on a reduced
>                polyhedral interface that is used in PCP. First PCP
>                integration in gcc - later extended by reductions.
>
>                No good representation for reductions for the general
>                case. Like conditions and PHI nodes (Sebastian) Maybe
>                for a subset of the reductions we can add commutativaty
>                of operations.
>
>      * Autopar: Li prepared some patches to trigger autopar by
>        graphite.
>              * Autopar failed in the graphite branch even without
>                graphite enabled. It seems we introduced a bug while
>                using some code of it for graphite. The breakage happens
>                in the reductions part.
>      * Merge from trunk:
>              * Sebastian wants to work on this Changes in vectorizer
>                Last merge 4 months ago Tried mid march but was
>                difficult. So stopped because of ENOTIME.
>      * Parts of graphite working well?: The polyhedral part of the
>        graphite architecture will be described
>              * in the Tobias' paper at the summit and the PCP part by
>                Jan.
>      * Worldwide interest: Cristianno Martins from Brazil showed some
>        interest
>              * http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2009-04/msg00711.html
>
>              * We already have people from the US, Europe and China
>                contributing.
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to