On Wed, 1 Apr 2009 00:02:43 -0500
Sebastian Pop wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 21:41, Ryan Hill wrote:
> > On Sun, 29 Mar 2009 14:11:37 -0500
> > Sebastian Pop wrote:
> >
> >> I committed the attached fix to the cloog-ppl repo, and I will
> >> prepare a new tar.gz for the gcc infrastructure.
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 21:41, Ryan Hill wrote:
> On Sun, 29 Mar 2009 14:11:37 -0500
> Sebastian Pop wrote:
>
>> I committed the attached fix to the cloog-ppl repo, and I will prepare
>> a new tar.gz for the gcc infrastructure.
>
> Is changing the contents of the tarball without changing the name
On Sun, 29 Mar 2009 14:11:37 -0500
Sebastian Pop wrote:
> I committed the attached fix to the cloog-ppl repo, and I will prepare
> a new tar.gz for the gcc infrastructure.
Is changing the contents of the tarball without changing the name going
to be a habit or just something we'll have to live w
Hi,
On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 11:32, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> I can confirm that PPL now builds successfully for i686-mingw32 host. The
> next problem is that CLooG (the tarball in the infrastructure directory)
> doesn't appear portable to this system (in the secondary platforms list
> for 4.4 and
On Sun, 29 Mar 2009, Roberto Bagnara wrote:
> Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> > On Fri, 20 Mar 2009, Roberto Bagnara wrote:
> > > thanks for the detailed explanation. I admit we always have postoponed
> > > the
> > > issue of cross-compilation... to the point we almost forgot it. We will
> > > fix the
Joseph S. Myers wrote:
On Fri, 20 Mar 2009, Roberto Bagnara wrote:
thanks for the detailed explanation. I admit we always have postoponed the
issue of cross-compilation... to the point we almost forgot it. We will
fix the PPL asap. Can we come back to you in case we are unsure about which
def
On Fri, 20 Mar 2009, Roberto Bagnara wrote:
> The point is that we had since long decided to make PPL 0.11, due to the
> many little glitches people has reported and due to the fact that the
> changes would not allow to preserve the ABI. Backporting all the changes
> to PPL 0.10 would be a lot of
Joseph S. Myers wrote:
On Fri, 20 Mar 2009, Roberto Bagnara wrote:
Work has already started for producing an official PPL 0.11 release.
This will contain fixes for all the problems we discovered since the release
of PPL 0.10 (mainly portability ones), a new "formatted output" feature
that is nee
On Fri, 20 Mar 2009, Roberto Bagnara wrote:
> Hi Joseph,
>
> thanks for the detailed explanation. I admit we always have postoponed the
> issue of cross-compilation... to the point we almost forgot it. We will
> fix the PPL asap. Can we come back to you in case we are unsure about which
> defa
Joseph S. Myers wrote:
I tried building GCC with Graphite enabled and all the libraries it
requires in a Canadian cross configuration (build = i686-pc-linux-gnu,
host = i686-mingw32, target = arm-none-eabi). This failed with:
configure:11279: checking for the possibility to control the FPU
co
10 matches
Mail list logo
