On Wed, 1 Apr 2009 00:02:43 -0500 Sebastian Pop <seb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 21:41, Ryan Hill <dirtye...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > On Sun, 29 Mar 2009 14:11:37 -0500 > > Sebastian Pop <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> I committed the attached fix to the cloog-ppl repo, and I will > >> prepare a new tar.gz for the gcc infrastructure. > > > > Is changing the contents of the tarball without changing the name > > going to be a habit or just something we'll have to live with until > > release? > > Sorry to not have paid attention to this: Joseph Myers already warned > me about this. > > > It wrecks havoc with our (Gentoo's) manifest system and I'll have to > > host a copy here if it's going to continue to be modified without a > > version bump. > > > > I will call the next package cloog-ppl-0.15.2.tar.gz > Would that work for you? You bet. Thanks! -- gcc-porting, by design, by neglect treecleaner, for a fact or just for effect wxwidgets @ gentoo EFFD 380E 047A 4B51 D2BD C64F 8AA8 8346 F9A4 0662
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
