With
its user-friendly interface and advanced algorithms, ZeroGPT's Citation
Generator streamlines the process of generating citation with all the format
available, providing writers, editors, and students with a powerful resources
and features.
I stumbled upon your website http://gcc.gnu.
On Tue, Feb 1, 2022 at 12:20 PM Jonathan Leffler via Gcc
wrote:
>
> The prerequisites page https://gcc.gnu.org/install/prerequisites.html lists
> (for MPC):
>
> It can be downloaded from http://www.multiprecision.org/mpc/.
>
>
> The website actually s
The prerequisites page https://gcc.gnu.org/install/prerequisites.html lists
(for MPC):
It can be downloaded from http://www.multiprecision.org/mpc/.
The website actually supports https now: https://www.multiprecision.org/mpc/
--
Jonathan Leffler #include
Guardian of DBD::Informix
HI
i hope you are well
I am looking to buy a sponsored article on your website ,
http://www.gnu.org/
What is the cost per article ?
Dofollow links permanent ?
Can you add a link in your existing article?
it could be a new article or an insertion in an already published article .?
If you have
/* -*- mode: C; mode: fold; -*- */
/* Copyright (c) 1992, 1998, 2000, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006 John E. Davis
* This file is part of JED editor library source.
*
* You may distribute this file under the terms the GNU General Public
* License. See the file COPYING for more information.
*/
very happy to be able to become a mirror for GCC .
Mirror *HTTP* URL:
http://mirror.clientvps.com/gcc/
Mirror *HTTPS* URL:
https://mirror.clientvps.com/gcc/
*FTP* Mirror:
ftp://mirror.clientvps.com/gcc/
*RSYNC *Mirror:
rsync -r rsync://mirror.clientvps.com:/gcc /path/to/mirror
Country the mirror is
On Wed, 4 Dec 2019, Dan Allen wrote:
> http://www.netgull.com has gcc snapshots and releases, but in the past
> few weeks only the diffs are there - none of the actual source tarballs
> are present.
>
> I am not sure how to get this message through to netball, but I figured
>
http://www.netgull.com has gcc snapshots and releases, but in the past few
weeks only the diffs are there - none of the actual source tarballs are present.
I am not sure how to get this message through to netball, but I figured you had
a better chance than I.
Thanks for GCC!
Dan Allen
Idaho
Hi -
> > [...] Please see http://gcc.gnu.org/ftp/ .
> Got 403:
Thanks, fixed.
- FChE
On 10/23/2015 02:39 AM, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
> Hi -
>
> At the request of tbsaunders, we're experimenting with
> provinding http[s] access to parts of the ftp://gcc.gnu.org/
> contents. Please see http://gcc.gnu.org/ftp/ .
>
> - FChE
>
Got 403:
$ ns
Hi -
At the request of tbsaunders, we're experimenting with
provinding http[s] access to parts of the ftp://gcc.gnu.org/
contents. Please see http://gcc.gnu.org/ftp/ .
- FChE
Thank you for this information, after a quick look at the problem, i
noticed that mirror is working (http://gcc.petsads.us/releases/ for
example), only the main page index somehow gets 403 error.
Wiil be fixed very soon.
On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 1:30 AM, D Waitzman wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The
Hi,
The site "US, Saint Louis: http://gcc.petsads.us, thanks to Sergey Kutserey
(s.kutserey at gmail.com)" appears broken. When you open that URL, you get a
default apache website without any other content.
--
D. Waitzman
John Franklin wrote:
"cpmpilation"
probably meant "compilation"
Thanks for the report. I have fixed it with the attached patch.
Tobias
Index: gcc-4.8/changes.html
===
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/gcc-4.8/changes.html,v
retri
"cpmpilation"
probably meant "compilation"
In bug 55237, Uros suggested to implement shortcuts from the like of
http://gcc.gnu.org/r194572
to
http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?view=revision&revision=194572
I implemented this now, but before making this a new standard, I
did want to ask here whether any of you have concerns or suggest
On Thu, 26 Jul 2012, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>> This page: http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libstdc++/faq.html (and other
>> pages) don't include a utf-8 charset in the content-type http header,
> See http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2012-04/msg00597.html and
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gc
On Fri, 15 Jun 2012, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>> They clause client code taking the address
>>
>> => cause
>>
>>
>> structs adn classes
>> => and
> So fix them, it's a wiki.
I saw these typos were still there, so I just fixed them.
Thanks for the report, Jay.
Gerald
ouch. I had forgotten about this, which is now PR 54102.
-benjamin
Thanks!
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2012-06/msg00128.html also mentions that
http header munging as the preferred method.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2012-04/msg00597.html shows why ff & ie are right.
Thanks again!
-Dhruv.
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 10:19 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 26 Ju
On 26 July 2012 17:54, Dhruv Matani wrote:
> Hello,
>
> This page: http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libstdc++/faq.html (and other
> pages) don't include a utf-8 charset in the content-type http header,
See http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2012-04/msg00597.html and
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc
Hello,
This page: http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libstdc++/faq.html (and other
pages) don't include a utf-8 charset in the content-type http header,
which is causing the page to be rendered incorrectly in firefox. Is it
possible to fix that? Even though the html header contains the utf-8
On 15 June 2012 22:58, Jay K wrote:
> I saw it said "ummutable page".
> I'll check again.
You need to be logged in to edit anything on the wiki, but anyone can
create a user and log in.
On 15 June 2012 21:56, Jay K wrote:
>
> They clause client code taking the address
>
> => cause
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> structs adn classes
> => and
So fix them, it's a wiki.
They clause client code taking the address
=> cause
structs adn classes
=> and
> I would like to report some broken links on
> http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/ Namely links to PDF version of "GCC
> 4.6.2 Standard C++ Library Reference Manual" and "GCC 4.6.2 Standard
> C++ Library Manual" referencing
> http://gcc.gnu.org/onl
Hello,
I would like to report some broken links on http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/
Namely links to PDF version of "GCC 4.6.2 Standard C++ Library
Reference Manual" and "GCC 4.6.2 Standard C++ Library Manual"
referencing
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.6.2/libstdc++/libs
On 21 February 2011 20:57, Robert Gezelter wrote:
> Gentlemen,
>
> The example of the C preprocessor implementation of MIN is erroneous:
>
> #define MIN(X,Y) ((X) < (Y) ? : (X) : (Y))
>
> should read:
>
> #define MIN(X,Y) ((X) < (Y) ? (X) : (Y))
Thanks for the report, but I don't think any
|
| United States of Americahttp://www.rlgsc.com |
+--+
From: Jennings, Mike-P64648
Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2010 12:50 PM
To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: RE: Accessing http://www3.hmc.edu/~neldredge/yamd/
From: Jennings, Mike-P64648
Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2010 12:26 PM
To: 'gcc@gcc.gnu.org'
Subject: RE: Accessing http://ww
Possibly a note for:
http://gcc.gnu.org/install/specific.html
under OpenBSD.
or just for the mail archives:
Building a *slight* fork of 4.5.1 on OpenBSD/x86 4.7 I hit
gcc -c -g -O2 -static -DIN_GCC -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings \
-Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-format
14 Aug 2010 15:41:56 -
@@ -35,7 +35,6 @@ Key fingerprint = 33C2 35A3 4C46 AA3F FB
Austria: ftp://gd.tuwien.ac.at/gnu/gcc/";>gd.tuwien.ac.at,
thanks to Antonin dot Sprinzl at tuwien dot ac dot at
Bulgaria: http://gcc.igor.onlinedirect.bg/";>gcc.igor.onlinedirect.bg, thanks
On Thu, 5 Aug 2010, Mark Hahn wrote:
> this mirror seems to be stuck at versions around late 2009.
Thanks for letting us know, Mark.
Let me include i...@internet.bs -- can you fix this or should I remove
your mirror?
Gerald
this mirror seems to be stuck at versions around late 2009.
regards, mark hahn.
This question is in response to Ian's answer here:
Ref: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2009-07/msg00462.html
Adding to the referenced inquiry, there are on the machine a condition
codes register for each register.
I would like to model this by writing define_insns in such a way as to
acc
Loren James Rittle writes:
> Since around Wednesday of last week, I have been unable to access
> svn+ssh://ljrit...@gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc through
> http://sshproxy.sourceware.org:443/
>
> I have not changed any local configuration in some time but definitely
> not since it wor
Since around Wednesday of last week, I have been unable to access
svn+ssh://ljrit...@gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc through
http://sshproxy.sourceware.org:443/
I have not changed any local configuration in some time but definitely
not since it worked the day before that.
I do not control the outbound
Larry Evans writes:
> I don't have any program called Mail on my system:
It's usually part of the mailx package. In any case, you can edit the
script to use any command line program which sends e-mail.
Ian
2009/8/18 Larry Evans:
> I don't have any program called Mail on my system:
It might be called /usr/bin/mailx or just /usr/bin/mail (small 'm') on
some systems.
Jonathan
ing synaptic to search for Mail
is not very useful. I've tried searching:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_e-mail_clients
and that mentions Mail as being from Apple; so, that
can't be the one.
TIA.
-Larry
> Dennis Clarke wrote:
> > How did you do with the new PPL bits ? That went smoothly ?
>>
> They're not mandatory for 4.4.x so I've simply ignored them for now.
ah .. how very tricky of you :-)
Dennis
Dennis Clarke wrote:
> How did you do with the new PPL bits ? That went smoothly ?
They're not mandatory for 4.4.x so I've simply ignored them for now.
-tgc
> Dennis Clarke wrote:
>> Re: http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.3/buildstat.html
>>
>> I was looking for testsuite results to compare with on Solaris and I saw
>> that nearly every report for GCC 4.3.3 was done by Tom G. Christensen.
>>
>> All GCC 4.3.3 reports
Dennis Clarke wrote:
Re: http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.3/buildstat.html
I was looking for testsuite results to compare with on Solaris and I saw
that nearly every report for GCC 4.3.3 was done by Tom G. Christensen.
All GCC 4.3.3 reports on Solaris from one person :
You better get cracking on
Re: http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.3/buildstat.html
I was looking for testsuite results to compare with on Solaris and I saw
that nearly every report for GCC 4.3.3 was done by Tom G. Christensen.
All GCC 4.3.3 reports on Solaris from one person :
i386-pc-solaris2.6 Test results: 4.3.3
Hi Jack,
On Tue, 21 Apr 2009, Jack Howarth wrote:
>A couple changes in gcc 4.4.0 were omitted for
> the darwin target. The gcc 4.4.0 release now supports
> a full multilib build on the x86_64-apple-darwin9 and
> x86_64-apple-darwin10 targets. The gfortran compiler
> is now capable of generatin
2009/4/23 Vincent Lefevre :
> There seems to be an error on
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.4/changes.html
>
> It says:
>
> -Wsequence-points now warns within if, while,do while and for
> conditions, and within for begin/end expressions.
>
> However the -Wsequence
There seems to be an error on
http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.4/changes.html
It says:
-Wsequence-points now warns within if, while,do while and for
conditions, and within for begin/end expressions.
However the -Wsequence-points option doesn't seem to exist.
Shouldn't it be -Wsequ
A couple changes in gcc 4.4.0 were omitted for
the darwin target. The gcc 4.4.0 release now supports
a full multilib build on the x86_64-apple-darwin9 and
x86_64-apple-darwin10 targets. The gfortran compiler
is now capable of generating binaries linked against
the static libgfortran library usin
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 15:15:45 -0400
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: James MacGregor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: We provide a web page with binaries of binutils/gcc/gdb you
might want add to http://gcc.gnu.org/install/binaries.html
Cc: "Craig Haller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Peter Dolding wrote on 21 July 2008 12:12:
> Biggest problem is that gimple only works in source code to object.
> Not with a stack of objects to exe.
We're on the case. You're looking for the LTO project.
http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/LinkTimeOptimization
cheers,
DaveK
Biggest problem is that gimple only works in source code to object.
Not with a stack of objects to exe. This has major downsides for
static building. To the point a lot of static builders end up sending
all .c files into gcc at once so they get cross object optimised.
One possible solution coul
On Fri, 18 Apr 2008, Benjamin Kosnik wrote:
>> libstdc++-html.20080213 drwxr-sr-x 2 bkoz gcc 258048 Mar 26
>> 06:05 libstdc++-html.20080326 drwxr-sr-x 2 bkoz gcc 237568 Jan
>> 18 06:49 libstdc++-html-USERS-20080118
>
> These are just the latest doxygen files, ie things that
> the "late
placements for these?
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libstdc++/parallel_mode.html
> http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libstdc++/ext/parallel_mode.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libstdc++/manual/parallel_mode.html
> http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libstdc++/ext/tr1.html
http:
> I've moved ext/pb_assoc now. Looking in the libstdc++ directory,
> there are a couple of further files/directories I'm not sure about:
>
> -rw-r--r-- 1 bkoz gcc 1862 Feb 12 20:27 bk02.html
> -rw-r--r-- 1 gccadmin gcc724 Apr 12 00:55 bk02.html.gz
> -rw-r--r-- 1 bkoz gc
links are broken. Do you have current
replacements for these?
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libstdc++/parallel_mode.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libstdc++/ext/parallel_mode.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libstdc++/ext/tr1.html
Thanks,
17:38:18 -0000 1.205
+++ faq.html12 Apr 2008 23:20:19 -
@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ and the http://www.fortran.com/
Information page.
Other GCC-related FAQs:
- http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libstdc++/faq/index.html";>
+ http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libstdc++/faq.htm
> > All the links your reference later in your email are actually dead
> > links, from the documentation pre-Docbook. IMHO they should not be
> > part of the libstdc++ online docs at all, but I don't know how to
> > remove them.
>
> That should happen automatically, as far as I can tell, now that
On Sun, 23 Mar 2008, Paolo Carlini wrote:
>> Working on the link consistency of the http://gcc.gnu.org, I ran into
>> a couple of links on the libstdc++ side that are in need of a bit love.
>> It would be great could one of you libstdc++ guys look into those.
> Should be all
Thanks Paolo for fixing up the links as requested by Gerald.
> Working on the link consistency of the http://gcc.gnu.org, I ran into
> a couple of links on the libstdc++ side that are in need of a bit
> love. It would be great could one of you libstdc++ guys look into
> those.
A
Hi Gerald,
Working on the link consistency of the http://gcc.gnu.org, I ran into
a couple of links on the libstdc++ side that are in need of a bit love.
It would be great could one of you libstdc++ guys look into those.
Should be all fixed with the below, applied mainline and 4_3-branch
Working on the link consistency of the http://gcc.gnu.org, I ran into
a couple of links on the libstdc++ side that are in need of a bit love.
It would be great could one of you libstdc++ guys look into those.
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libstdc++/ext/parallel_mode.html
* http
On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 2:21 PM, Oliver Hessling
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> there is a minor mistake in
> http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.3/changes.html
>
> at chapter: New Targets and Target Specific Improvements
> sub-section: IA-32/x86-64
>
> "SSSE
Hi,
there is a minor mistake in
http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.3/changes.html
at chapter: New Targets and Target Specific Improvements
sub-section: IA-32/x86-64
"SSSE3" should be replaced by
"SSE3"
cheers
Oliver
--
(o-(:¬)liver ]-[essling
//\+33 (0)6 31
Wei Chen wrote:
i think http://gcc.gnu.org/svn.html have a error.
"Using the SVN repository
Assuming you have version 1.0.0 and higher of Subversion installed,
you can check out the GCC sources using the following command:
svn -q checkout svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk gcc "
On 5/22/07, David Daney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Wei Chen wrote:
> i think http://gcc.gnu.org/svn.html have a error.
>
> "Using the SVN repository
>
> Assuming you have version 1.0.0 and higher of Subversion installed,
> you can check out the GCC sources using the
Wei Chen wrote:
i think http://gcc.gnu.org/svn.html have a error.
"Using the SVN repository
Assuming you have version 1.0.0 and higher of Subversion installed,
you can check out the GCC sources using the following command:
svn -q checkout svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk gcc "
On 5/21/07, Wei Chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
svn -q checkout svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk gcc "
the right is
svn -q checkout svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk
Not really, the syntax mentioned in the page is correct. The
additional argument 'gcc' merely means that on checkout,
i think http://gcc.gnu.org/svn.html have a error.
"Using the SVN repository
Assuming you have version 1.0.0 and higher of Subversion installed,
you can check out the GCC sources using the following command:
svn -q checkout svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk gcc "
the right is
On Wed, 17 Jan 2007, Ben Elliston wrote:
>> I found out that page http://gcc.gnu.org/svnwrite.html points to
>> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-SVN/ mailing list but it doesn't exist. It's
>> in section "Write access policies" above "Free for all" s
Richard Stallman wrote:
> http://publications.gbdirect.co.uk/c_book/ is reportedly a free
> book on C -- but it is C89, more or less.
>
> If it is well written, we could look for people to update it to modern
> C. But if it isn't well written and clear, it probably isn&#
http://publications.gbdirect.co.uk/c_book/ is reportedly a free
book on C -- but it is C89, more or less.
If it is well written, we could look for people to update it to modern
C. But if it isn't well written and clear, it probably isn't worth
the trouble.
If a few of you who are fam
> I found out that page http://gcc.gnu.org/svnwrite.html points to
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-SVN/ mailing list but it doesn't exist. It's
> in section "Write access policies" above "Free for all" subsection.
> It seems that correct list is http://gc
Hi,
I found out that page http://gcc.gnu.org/svnwrite.html points to
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-SVN/ mailing list but it doesn't exist. It's
in section "Write access policies" above "Free for all" subsection.
It seems that correct list is http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/.
Tomas
On Sat, 2 Sep 2006, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> On Sun, 27 Aug 2006, Richard Guenther wrote:
> > The problem is that installation instructions (and internals manuals)
> > are only available for trunk, not for released versions.
>
> These aren't online, but are part of the release tarballs.
>
> We c
On Sun, 27 Aug 2006, Richard Guenther wrote:
> The problem is that installation instructions (and internals manuals)
> are only available for trunk, not for released versions.
These aren't online, but are part of the release tarballs.
We could add generation of the installation documentation to
On 8/27/06, Georg Schwarz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Dear developers,
http://gcc.gnu.org/install/configure.html says
--enable-languages=lang1,lang2,...
...
Currently, you can use any of the following: all, ada, c, c++,
fortran, java, objc, obj-c++, treelang.
At least for the 3.4
Dear developers,
http://gcc.gnu.org/install/configure.html says
--enable-languages=lang1,lang2,...
...
Currently, you can use any of the following: all, ada, c, c++,
fortran, java, objc, obj-c++, treelang.
At least for the 3.4 train it seems that "fortran" is not suppor
Kindly post a solution to this prob:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2003-10/msg01005.html
Solution is:
Copy the libiconv.so.2 file into /usr/lib
on your machine.
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best
On 22 February 2006 16:40, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
>> Hi Paolo,
>>
>> thanks for the patch. I just saw Joseph's okay, but I believe there
>> is one minor detail left.
>>
>> On Wed, 22 Feb 2006, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>
>>> +GNU Make 3.79 and above, which is necessary to bui
Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
Hi Paolo,
thanks for the patch. I just saw Joseph's okay, but I believe there
is one minor detail left.
On Wed, 22 Feb 2006, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
+GNU Make 3.79 and above, which is necessary to build GCC, support
+building in parallel.
Specifically, in the sent
Hi Paolo,
thanks for the patch. I just saw Joseph's okay, but I believe there
is one minor detail left.
On Wed, 22 Feb 2006, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> +GNU Make 3.79 and above, which is necessary to build GCC, support
> +building in parallel.
Specifically, in the sentence above we have "which is"
ware Foundation, Inc.
Remember of course when committing to update both copyright notices.
--
Joseph S. Myers http://www.srcf.ucam.org/~jsm28/gcc/
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (personal mail)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (CodeSourcery mail)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bugzilla assignments and CCs)
There's a requirement to not use footnotes in install.texi, apparently.
Also, I did not know about install.texi2html so I added a note on it.
Ok to install?
Paolo
2006-02-22 Paolo Bonzini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* install.texi: Add notes on install.texi2html.
(Building in paral
There's a requirement to not use footnotes in install.texi, apparently.
Also, I did not know about install.texi2html so I added a note on it.
Ok to install?
Paolo
2006-02-22 Paolo Bonzini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* install.texi: Add notes on install.texi2html.
(Building in paral
c/doc/install.texi.
>
> Gerald removed these files for the reason shown above. However I'm
> not sure what we should do about it. Perhaps provide a small page
> explaining where to get installation docs.
This is not the relevant reference; the files should be generated by
insta
Hi.
> I was trying to look up some information about the installation of
> gcc on http://gcc.gnu.org/install/ and found out the the "Building"
> link (http://gcc.gnu.org/install/build.html) was dead. I checked out
> wwwdocs from CVS (as suggested) but I could not find t
Hi gcc-developers,
I was trying to look up some information about the installation of gcc
on http://gcc.gnu.org/install/ and found out the the "Building" link
(http://gcc.gnu.org/install/build.html) was dead. I checked out
wwwdocs from CVS (as suggested) but I could not find the a
> acats test cxg2014 hangs forever on hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.00.
This is PR ada/13408. I see that I opened this back in 2003.
It probably has something to do with the IEEE quad support.
Dave
--
J. David Anglin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
National Research Council of Canada
On Dec 16, 2005, at 3:05 PM, Richard Guenther wrote:
$subject - since a day now.
Thanks, fixed.
$subject - since a day now.
Richard.
--
Richard Guenther
WWW: http://www.tat.physik.uni-tuebingen.de/~rguenth/
This would be nice, for passive observers of GCC development, like me.
Josh
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Daniel Berlin
Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2005 6:04 PM
To: Joe Buck
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: anonymous svn over http
On Thu, 27 Oct 2005, Joe Buck wrote:
Is there a plan to support anonymous svn access via http?
It can be slower and more resource intensive.
I'd like to avoid it if possible, but if not,
Is there a plan to support anonymous svn access via http?
The possibility was mentioned in
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2005-02/msg00618.html
The svn: protocol won't work through our corporate firewall.
Hi,
I used to be able to access the svn.toolchain.org test repository
through our http proxy (the firewall will not permit svn or even svn+ssh
directly).
That repository had a published username and password for anonymous
access. The instructions are still in the wiki, although you have to
are seeing
is a bit confusing, since it doesn't mention the download accelerator
problem. It only mentions the spam bot problem. I asked for this to be
fixed once, but apparently nothing was done.
IE5, without a download accelerator, should work just fine.
--
Jim Wilson, GNU Tools Suppo
I just tried with Internet Explorer 6 (as installed by Windows XP Service
Pack 2) and it worked just fine.
Did you try another browser (e.g. Mozilla or Firefox)?
Sirs,
This web site is turning away Microsoft Internet Explorer 5. Following this
link http://gcc.gnu.org from Mandriva's web site at
http://www.mandriva.com/products/101/powerpack/packages?p=media-main2-gc
c-3.4.1-4mdk.i586.rpm.html results in the Spam Bot page at
http://sourcewar
On Wed, 25 May 2005, Olly Betts wrote:
>>> This page mentions the website :
>>> http://www2.iro.umontreal.ca/~pinard/po/registry.cgi?team=index
>>>
>>> while www2.iro.umontreal.ca has no DNS resolution.
>> It does resolve now; but then the webserver re
On 2005-05-25, Dave Korn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Vincent Deffontaines:
>> This page mentions the website :
>> http://www2.iro.umontreal.ca/~pinard/po/registry.cgi?team=index
>>
>> while www2.iro.umontreal.ca has no DNS resolution.
>
> It does resolv
1 - 100 of 117 matches
Mail list logo
