On Fri, 18 Apr 2008, Benjamin Kosnik wrote: >> libstdc++-html.20080213 drwxr-sr-x 2 bkoz gcc 258048 Mar 26 >> 06:05 libstdc++-html.20080326 drwxr-sr-x 2 bkoz gcc 237568 Jan >> 18 06:49 libstdc++-html-USERS-20080118 > > These are just the latest doxygen files, ie things that > the "latest-doxgen" symlink finds. > > We really only need what's current (ie, 20080326). (I was keeping some > of the older ones around because sometimes output changes depending on > doxygen version, and I wanted a quick way to check. However, the > 20080328 version is correct.)
I see a new version now. Will it be okay to remove drwxr-sr-x 2 bkoz gcc 114688 Feb 13 21:39 libstdc++-html.20080213 drwxr-sr-x 2 bkoz gcc 258048 Mar 26 06:05 libstdc++-html.20080326 and drwxr-sr-x 2 bkoz gcc 237568 Jan 18 06:49 libstdc++-html-USERS-20080118 Do you see any chance to integrate the building of this documentation into the generation of the regular release-specific documentation and perhaps have the documents under those subdirectories instead of having this under libstdc++? That would make things more consistent, but I do not know how hard this will be. Gerald
