Hi Dan,
Reply below.
Best regards
On Thu, 4 Aug 2005 02:05, Dan Kegel wrote:
> "Paul C. Leopardi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > So I seem to be left with a large ( >2.5MB ) preprocessed source file.
> > Should I try to report the bug using this large file
Hi Volker,
On Thu, 4 Aug 2005 02:31 am, Volker Reichelt wrote:
> You might want to try a recent snapshot of gcc 4.0.2, first.
> Two aliasing bugs got fixed after the 4.0.1 release:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/PR22591
> http://gcc.gnu.org/PR23192
>
> The first even caused std::list::swap to be miscompile
Hi Janis,
A belated reply to your message is below.
Best regards, Paul Leopardi
On Tue, 17 May 2005 03:23 am, Janis Johnson wrote:
> On Sat, May 14, 2005 at 12:16:54PM +1000, Paul C. Leopardi wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > I originally posted these messages to gcc-help, but had no reply,
Hi all,
I've solved this. Thanks to Ian Lance Taylor, H. J. Lu and Mike Stump.
See below.
Best regards, Paul
I checked the output of make check-c++ RUNTESTFLAGS="-v" and noticed the line:
Found ~/.dejagnurc
In ~/.dejagnurc I found:
set GXX_UNDER_TEST "g++"
Judging form the modification date of
Hi Ian, My replies are below, Best regards. Paul
On Thu, 28 Jul 2005 11:05 am, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> "Paul C. Leopardi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/src/gcc/gcc-4.0.1-obj> ../gcc-4.0.1/configure
> > --prefix=/usr/local/gcc/gcc-4.0.1 --
Hi all, a quick follow-up below.
Best regards, Paul Leopardi
On Thu, 28 Jul 2005 12:04 pm, Paul C. Leopardi wrote:
> In output of make -k check, I did notice that autogen is missing, causing
> an "Error 2", but the test carries on regardless. Is this OK?
...
> SUSE packaged aut
Mike,
Thanks. Reply below.
Best regards, Paul Leopardi
On Thu, 28 Jul 2005 10:40 am, Mike Stump wrote:
> On Jul 27, 2005, at 5:21 PM, Paul C. Leopardi wrote:
> >> What sets the value of this variable?
>
> We will expect you to be able to find the code and read it. The code
>
Hi Lance,
Thanks for your prompt reply. Point by point, below.
Best regards, Paul Leopardi
On Thu, 28 Jul 2005 10:26 am, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> "Paul C. Leopardi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Hi all,
> > I did not receive a reply to my earlier message. Have I
Hi all,
I did not receive a reply to my earlier message. Have I posted it to the wrong
list? If so, what is the right list for this message?
Thanks
On Sat, 23 Jul 2005 07:23 pm, Paul C. Leopardi wrote:
> How do I make the tests find the bootstrapped g++? Shouldn't the test just
&
Hi all,
I have recently downloaded, configured, bootstrapped and tested gcc 4.0.1 and
found the same problem that I reported for gcc 3.4.0 as PR/15356.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15356
See also the threads "gcc testsuite apparently can't find g++"
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-help/2
time when earlier versions of ICC and gcc were not as
compliant with the C++ standard. I'll have to take the current versions of
ICC and gcc as correct, and change the code.
Best regards, Paul Leopardi
On Sat, 14 May 2005 02:03 pm, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> On May 13, 2005, at 10:16 PM, Paul
Hi all,
I originally posted these messages to gcc-help, but had no reply, so I am
re-posting links to them here.
I think I have found a bug in g++ 4.0.0, but need help in reporting it.
Maintainers like their bug reports to include short test cases, but I don't
know how to generate a short test
12 matches
Mail list logo
