Snapshot gcc-10-20210514 is now available on
https://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/10-20210514/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 10 git branch
with the following options: git://gcc.gnu.org/git/gcc.git branch
On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 3:27 AM Richard Biener via Gcc wrote:
>
> On May 14, 2021 10:53:21 AM GMT+02:00, "Martin Liška" wrote:
> >On 5/12/21 10:51 AM, Richard Biener via Gcc wrote:
> >> On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 6:34 PM Serge Belyshev via Gcc
> > wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> $ egrep "mpfr\.h" log/cfg/
On 5/14/21 3:41 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 08:56:39PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
>From 8718fbbf83978bd8ec4bf0a0e4164459158df182 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jason Merrill
Date: Thu, 13 May 2021 20:53:50 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] intl: add comments to _, N_, and G_
To: gcc-
GCC version 8.5 has been released.
GCC 8.5 is a bug-fix release from the GCC 8 branch
containing important fixes for regressions and serious bugs in
GCC 8.4 with more than 199 bugs fixed since the previous release.
This is also the last release from the GCC 8 branch, GCC continues
to be maintaine
Reading over
https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/cxx-modules?action=AttachFile&do=view&target=module-abi-2017-09-01.pdf,
in particular Section 4 ("Recommendation"), it suggests that code such as:
```
export module moo;
int moo() { return 10; }
```
should "have module-linkage include the module name in t
On 5/13/21 11:33 PM, Vadim Zeitlin wrote:
Hello,
While running my script[1] parsing gcc/c-family/c.opt to extract
information about the new warnings for C++ programs, I've noticed that a
couple of new warnings in gcc 11 don't use the "Warning" flag which, I had
assumed, would be used for all
On May 14, 2021 10:53:21 AM GMT+02:00, "Martin Liška" wrote:
>On 5/12/21 10:51 AM, Richard Biener via Gcc wrote:
>> On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 6:34 PM Serge Belyshev via Gcc
> wrote:
>>>
>>>
$ egrep "mpfr\.h" log/cfg/cfg.gcc-11.1.0.log
checking for the correct version of mpfr.h... buggy but
On 5/12/21 10:51 AM, Richard Biener via Gcc wrote:
On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 6:34 PM Serge Belyshev via Gcc wrote:
$ egrep "mpfr\.h" log/cfg/cfg.gcc-11.1.0.log
checking for the correct version of mpfr.h... buggy but acceptable
It appears "gcc-11.1.0/contrib/download_prerequisites"
specifies "
On Wednesday 12 May 2021 09:51:45 Richard Biener wrote:
> On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 6:34 PM Serge Belyshev via Gcc
wrote:
> > > $ egrep "mpfr\.h" log/cfg/cfg.gcc-11.1.0.log
> > > checking for the correct version of mpfr.h... buggy but acceptable
> > >
> > > It appears "gcc-11.1.0/contrib/download_p
Sorry, sent to wrong mail list.
From: Feng Xue OS
Sent: Friday, May 14, 2021 4:30 PM
To: gcc-patc...@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Question about non-POD class type
For an instance of a non-POD class, can I always assume that any
operation on it should be type-safe
On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 09:41:57AM +0200, Jakub Jelinek via Gcc wrote:
> I'd just write
> /* Like N_, but for GCC diagnostic format strings. See ABOUT-GCC-NLS for
>details. */
> for this and if something is unclear, clarify there.
See https://gcc.gnu.org/legacy-ml/gcc-patches/2005-06/threads
On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 08:56:39PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
> >From 8718fbbf83978bd8ec4bf0a0e4164459158df182 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Jason Merrill
> Date: Thu, 13 May 2021 20:53:50 -0400
> Subject: [PATCH] intl: add comments to _, N_, and G_
> To: gcc-patc...@gcc.gnu.org
>
> gcc/Chang
12 matches
Mail list logo
