On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 11:27 AM, Umesh Kalappa
wrote:
>
> In our private port ,we define function_arg hook to pass the first
> three args in the reg and rest will go to stack.
>
> But for variadic functions the arguments need to pass through the stack.
>
> How we can achieve this ?? Any inp
> On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 08:23:22PM +0200, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> > > On 04/25/2014 03:14 PM, Volker Simonis wrote:
> > > > Could you therefore please re-categorize this as devirt bug.
> > >
> > > It is an IPA bug. http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60965
> >
> > Now when I have interest
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 08:23:22PM +0200, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> > On 04/25/2014 03:14 PM, Volker Simonis wrote:
> > > Could you therefore please re-categorize this as devirt bug.
> >
> > It is an IPA bug. http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60965
>
> Now when I have interest from ubsan di
Thank you Eric for the inputs and will make the required changes.
Thank you Again
~Umesh
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 9:58 PM, Eric Botcazou wrote:
>> #define FIRST_PARM_OFFSET(FNDECL) (get_frame_size() +
>> STARTING_FRAME_OFFSET + RETURN_BYTES )
>
> I don't think that you can define FIRST_PARM_OFF
Hi All,
In our private port ,we define function_arg hook to pass the first
three args in the reg and rest will go to stack.
But for variadic functions the arguments need to pass through the stack.
How we can achieve this ?? Any inputs will be appreciate.
Thank you
~Umesh
> On 04/25/2014 03:14 PM, Volker Simonis wrote:
> > Could you therefore please re-categorize this as devirt bug.
>
> It is an IPA bug. http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60965
Now when I have interest from ubsan direction, I wanted to ask. Would it make
sense to turn
those unreachables
On April 25, 2014 6:56:00 PM CEST, Prathamesh Kulkarni
wrote:
>On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 10:12 PM, Richard Biener
> wrote:
>> On April 25, 2014 4:54:28 PM CEST, Prathamesh Kulkarni
> wrote:
>>>Hi,
>>>I have a daft question to ask. I was looking through genmatch, I
>>>couldn't figure out why is
On April 25, 2014 5:54:09 PM CEST, Swati Rathi
wrote:
>Hello,
>
>I am trying to print points-to information for SSA variables as below.
>
> for (i = 1; i < num_ssa_names; i++)
> {
> tree ptr = ssa_name (i);
> struct ptr_info_def *pi;
>
> if (ptr == NULL_TREE
> ||
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 10:12 PM, Richard Biener
wrote:
> On April 25, 2014 4:54:28 PM CEST, Prathamesh Kulkarni
> wrote:
>>Hi,
>>I have a daft question to ask. I was looking through genmatch, I
>>couldn't figure out why is tree code class (TYPE) stringified in call
>>to add_operator () ?
>>
On April 25, 2014 4:54:28 PM CEST, Prathamesh Kulkarni
wrote:
>Hi,
>I have a daft question to ask. I was looking through genmatch, I
>couldn't figure out why is tree code class (TYPE) stringified in call
>to add_operator () ?
>
>#define DEFTREECODE (SYM, STRING, TYPE, NARGS) \
>add_operat
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 1:31 PM, Eric Botcazou wrote:
>> recent GCC versions support the C11 atomic operations for the SPARC LEON3
>> processor via the CASA instruction. GCC emits CASA instructions with an ASI
>> of 0x80. I think this is due to the usage of "cas" if I get the stuff in
>> sync.md
> recent GCC versions support the C11 atomic operations for the SPARC LEON3
> processor via the CASA instruction. GCC emits CASA instructions with an ASI
> of 0x80. I think this is due to the usage of "cas" if I get the stuff in
> sync.md right:
>
> "(define_insn "*atomic_compare_and_swap_1"
>
> #define FIRST_PARM_OFFSET(FNDECL) (get_frame_size() +
> STARTING_FRAME_OFFSET + RETURN_BYTES )
I don't think that you can define FIRST_PARM_OFFSET like so, you need to have
a fixed FIRST_PARM_OFFSET (for some definition of fixed) and eliminate the
argument pointer during reload.
--
Eric Bo
> Summary: Devirtualization uses type information to determine if a
> virtual method is reachable from a call site. If type information
> indicates that it is not, devirt marks the site as unreachable. I
> think this is wrong, and it breaks some programs. At least, it should
> not do this if the
Hello,
I am trying to print points-to information for SSA variables as below.
for (i = 1; i < num_ssa_names; i++)
{
tree ptr = ssa_name (i);
struct ptr_info_def *pi;
if (ptr == NULL_TREE
|| SSA_NAME_IN_FREE_LIST (ptr))
continue;
pi = SSA_NAME_PTR
Hi,
I have a daft question to ask. I was looking through genmatch, I
couldn't figure out why is tree code class (TYPE) stringified in call
to add_operator () ?
#define DEFTREECODE (SYM, STRING, TYPE, NARGS) \
add_operator (SYM, #SYM, #TYPE, NARGS)
In add_operator() tcc (argument correspo
On 04/25/2014 03:14 PM, Volker Simonis wrote:
> Could you therefore please re-categorize this as devirt bug.
It is an IPA bug. http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60965
Andrew.
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 2:05 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>On 25 April 2014 13:01, Richard Biener wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 1:18 PM, Jonathan Wakely
>> wrote:
>>> On 25 April 2014 11:22, Andrew Haley wrote:
Summary: Devirtualization uses type information to determine if a
virtual
Hi All,
Our private backend has the macro defined as
#define FIRST_PARM_OFFSET(FNDECL) (get_frame_size() +
STARTING_FRAME_OFFSET + RETURN_BYTES )
#define STARTING_FRAME_OFFSET 1
#define STACK_POINTER_REGNUM10
#define FRAME_POINTER_REGNUM STACK_POINTER_REGNUM
#define ARG_POINTER_REGNUM
On 04/25/2014 01:01 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
> I agree, -fstrict-aliasing has nothing to do with this. Sounds simply like
> a genuine bug (please open a bugzilla).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60965
Andrew.
Hello,
recent GCC versions support the C11 atomic operations for the SPARC LEON3
processor via the CASA instruction. GCC emits CASA instructions with an ASI of
0x80. I think this is due to the usage of "cas" if I get the stuff in sync.md
right:
"(define_insn "*atomic_compare_and_swap_1"
On 25 April 2014 13:01, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 1:18 PM, Jonathan Wakely
> wrote:
>> On 25 April 2014 11:22, Andrew Haley wrote:
>>> Summary: Devirtualization uses type information to determine if a
>>> virtual method is reachable from a call site. If type information
>>>
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 1:18 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 25 April 2014 11:22, Andrew Haley wrote:
>> Summary: Devirtualization uses type information to determine if a
>> virtual method is reachable from a call site. If type information
>> indicates that it is not, devirt marks the site as unr
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 11:22:22AM +0100, Andrew Haley wrote:
> Summary: Devirtualization uses type information to determine if a
> virtual method is reachable from a call site. If type information
> indicates that it is not, devirt marks the site as unreachable. I
> think this is wrong, an
On 25 April 2014 11:22, Andrew Haley wrote:
> Summary: Devirtualization uses type information to determine if a
> virtual method is reachable from a call site. If type information
> indicates that it is not, devirt marks the site as unreachable. I
> think this is wrong, and it breaks some program
Summary: Devirtualization uses type information to determine if a
virtual method is reachable from a call site. If type information
indicates that it is not, devirt marks the site as unreachable. I
think this is wrong, and it breaks some programs. At least, it should
not do this if the user spec
Hi,
I have attached a patch based on the recommendation. Can you please review and
apply, if it looks ok ?. I don't have commit access.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
2014-04-25 Soundararajan Dhakshinamoorthy
* gcc.c-torture/execute/pr58419.c: Adjust the test to work with bare
metal tar
On Thu, 24 Apr 2014, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 02/28/14 08:21, Kai Tietz wrote:
> > Hmm, this all reminds me about the approach Andrew Pinski and I came
> > up with two years ago. All in all I think it might be worth to
> > express folding-patterns in a more abstract way. So the md-like Lisp
> > syn
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 6:00 PM, Benedikt Huber
wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I want to uninline some basic blocks to a separate function to aid slp
> vectorization.
> The new pass runs just before the slp vectorization pass.
> As a first try I create an new and empty function.
> Which in turn will be filled
On 24/04/14 22:07, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
Hi!
Seems the new cost model for Cortex A8 is missing two initializer
fields:
g++ -c -g -O2 -DIN_GCC -DCROSS_DIRECTORY_STRUCTURE -fno-exceptions
-fno-rtti -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -W -Wall -Wno-narrowing -Wwrite-strings
-Wcast-qual -Wmissing
30 matches
Mail list logo
