I'm investigating another build failure for Fedora 17 (based on 4.7).
The failing compile from the build log is as follows:
/bin/sh ./libtool --tag=CC
--mode=compile
/builddir/build/BUILD/gcc-4.7.0-20120504/obj-ppc64-redhat-linux/./gcc/xgcc
-B/builddir/build/BUILD/gcc-4.7.0-20120504/obj-ppc64-r
Snapshot gcc-4.5-20120510 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.5-20120510/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.5 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches
> > Committed that way. Thanks! Ok for 4.7 branch as well?
>
> yes, it is. Thanks,
Done!
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 3:33 PM, DJ Delorie wrote:
>
>> style nits: It should be size_t(__len - __pos), and not
>> (size_t)(__len - __pos). Same for the other hunk. Patch OK with
>> those changes.
>
> Committed that way. Thanks! Ok for 4.7 branch as well?
yes, it is. Thanks,
-- Gaby
Hi
Using today's source via git and targeting i386-rtems4.11, the
build ends with this. I changed ASM_OUTPUT_ASCII in
gcc/config/i386/i386elf.h to use "const char *" instead of
"const unsigned char *" and the build continued.
Does that look to be the correct change? If so, I will
submit a patch
> style nits: It should be size_t(__len - __pos), and not
> (size_t)(__len - __pos). Same for the other hunk. Patch OK with
> those changes.
Committed that way. Thanks! Ok for 4.7 branch as well?
* include/bits/random.tcc (seed_seq::generate): Cast max()
operands to size_t to
On 10 May 2012 11:52, Iain Buclaw wrote:
>
> Thanks, would it be best to split the frontend, library, and patches
> to gcc proper into three parts?
>From observing how other big projects got merged, I think it is better:
1) If you have anything that can be committed independently of gdc
(like b
On 10 May 2012 10:48, Richard Guenther wrote:
> On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 11:37 AM, Iain Buclaw wrote:
>> On 11 April 2012 15:12, Iain Buclaw wrote:
>>> On 4 October 2011 08:08, Iain Buclaw wrote:
Hi,
I've have received news from Walter Bright that the license of the D
fronten
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 11:37 AM, Iain Buclaw wrote:
> On 11 April 2012 15:12, Iain Buclaw wrote:
>> On 4 October 2011 08:08, Iain Buclaw wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I've have received news from Walter Bright that the license of the D
>>> frontend has been assigned to the FSF. As the current maintain
On 11 April 2012 15:12, Iain Buclaw wrote:
> On 4 October 2011 08:08, Iain Buclaw wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've have received news from Walter Bright that the license of the D
>> frontend has been assigned to the FSF. As the current maintainer of
>> GDC, I would like to get this moved forward, startin
On Monday 07 May 2012 20:14:07 John David Anglin wrote:
> On 5/7/2012 2:29 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
> > On 05/07/2012 12:25 PM, John David Anglin wrote:
> >> There is also a 32-bit netbsd port that a limited number of users are
> >> still using.
> >
> > Do you know if they're using the open-sourced SOM
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 10:52 PM, William J. Schmidt
wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-05-09 at 13:47 -0700, Andrew Pinski wrote:
>> On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 1:36 PM, William J. Schmidt
>> wrote:
>> > Greetings,
>> >
>> > I've been debugging a Fedora 17 build problem on ppc64-redhat-linux, and
>> > ran into an
12 matches
Mail list logo
